IDEA help: Got Ethics? - Help.com

Scalar Naturae
offline Verified (1 year, 10 months) Visit Scalar Naturae's shoutbox
Seattle, WA, US

Got Ethics?

I am taking this environmental ethics class, and the prof. put forth an interesting idea. I am not sure how I feel about this issue, but what do you think?

Do we have different obligations domestic animals (pets, zoo animals, animals intended for slaughter) than wild animals? and if we do have different duties what are they?

This open post was written 1 year, 8 months ago | V/U/S: 430, 6, 4 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post


Reciprocity (0) Reciprocation Failure -- The poster has NOT helped anyone else yet!

Since writing this post Scalar Naturae may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. Scalar Naturae is a verified member, has been around for 1 year, 10 months and has 10 posts and 271 replies to their name.

Post Tags (12)

Replies (6)

Where were you?

Click and drag to move the map around. FAQ: How we place people on this map »
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
Mouse over the map for 2 seconds to see an expanded, interactive view

Scalar Naturae invited 1 user to read this post 1 year, 8 months ago.

ĐaNi HaŦeS ŸoŪ offline Verified User (2 years, 5 months) Help.com Volunteer Moderator Long Term User Shouts: 189 #
An Unknown Location | 1 year, 8 months ago (18 minutes after post)

zoo animals are intended for slaughter?

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Help me with: ok so I lied.
Scalar Naturae offline Verified User (1 year, 10 months) Long Term User Shouts: 2 #
Seattle, WA, US | 1 year, 8 months ago (45 minutes after post)

I think I have poorly worded this (because it makes total sense to me)
DaNi zoo animals are NOT intended for slaughter, I am including them as “domestic” animals.

But the idea is, the animals which we have a bond with, i.e do we have a greater obligation to things which we love? Or do we have a greater obligation to them because we took them out of the wilderness. Or do we have a greater obligation because we are going to kill and consume them…

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Scalar Naturae offline Verified User (1 year, 10 months) Long Term User Shouts: 2 #
Seattle, WA, US | 1 year, 8 months ago (56 minutes after post)

I appreciate your conversation Mas, but I have a question for you, what intrinsic value does a cat or dog have that farm animals don’t that would necessitate the extra obligations? (not arguing with your answer, but wondering.)

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Sodapop offline Verified User (1 year, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Undisclosed Location | 1 year, 8 months ago (3 days, 13 hours after post)

maybee bc we usually dont come in contact with wild animals, they can usually take care of themselves. as far as domestic animals, we encounter them and they affect all of our lives in one way or another, so its natural that we have certain duties toward them.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Help me with: A little prayer
hey...iknowyou offline Verified User (1 year, 8 months) Long Term User Shouts: 18 #
An Unknown Location | 1 year, 6 months ago (2 months after post)

Well with pets such as cats and dogs you develop a bond with them. You have an obligation to feed them and look after them on account of they have been domesticated and are less likely to be able to fend for themselves if you do not provide for them. Because that bond is there though people will generally treat them differently, as mas already pointed out, you tend to treat them like a family member.

The likes of zoo animals, while I’m sure zoo keepers develop bonds with the animals I would not imagine it would be as close a one as that of an ordinary pet, purely because the zoo keepers are looking after so many animals. Also zoo animals do not tend to be domesticated so there is an obligation to provide as natural a habitat as possible for them.

This is similar to our obligation for wild animals. While there may not be any bond with them, there should still be an obligation to ensure that their habitat remains natural so that they may live there as they always have. Of course this is not the way things are, just the way things should be. (In my opinion at least)

I don’t know if this was the kind of answer you were looking for or not, I’m quite sleepy so I may have misread parts of the responses, if I did get off the point a bit then my apologies :)

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Help me with: Computery People

Invite Others to Help

A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.