What is truth?
Who knows? Who can tell me?
This open post was written 1 month, 3 weeks ago | V/U/S: 390, 166, 14 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post
Reciprocity (17)
Since writing this post Rowass has helped in 17 other users' posts within the last 4 days. Rowass is a verified member, has been around for 7 months and has 30 posts and 1,100 replies to their name.
Post Tags (3)
Replies (166)
Where were you?
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
You could look at my profile and see what I wrote about it — but don’t come back and insult me about it cuz I have a headache, thanks.
Truth is a part of an element of a fact.
:P Honestly I have no clue, but this post really made me think.
Michael Leibman wrote:
You could look at my profile and see what I wrote about it — but don’t come back and insult me about it cuz I have a headache, thanks.
This makes sense but it wasn’t exactly what I was looking for.
The truth. The truth, or more well put, a truth is something that we perceive to be correct and is generally accepted and supported by “facts” of which stem from theories that we have created. Truth is worthless.
Truth is dependent on objective reality and is perfect and eternal, not on subjective perception which is imperfect and capricious.
Anonymous wrote:
The truth. The truth, or more well put, a truth is something that we perceive to be correct and is generally accepted and supported by “facts” of which stem from theories that we have created. Truth is worthless.
I’m not sure about that.
Spheres have the sound “fear” in them.
It’s easy if you use math …
☺ wrote:
The earth is approximately spherical.
Sorry, no burn on you, but someone could then say “pi is between 3 & 4″ sure … its easy to use math to post a truth.
correction
“Sphere” has the sound “fear” in it.
Michael Leibman wrote:
correction”Sphere” has the sound “fear” in it.
I like the first version better. :)
pi
florie wrote:
Michael Leibman wrote:I like the first version better. :)
correction”Sphere” has the sound “fear” in it.
Is that true?
paper_weight wrote:
It’s easy if you use math …
☺ wrote:Sorry, no burn on you, but someone could then say “pi is between 3 & 4″ sure … its easy to use math to post a truth.
The earth is approximately spherical.
Why would that be a “burn on me”? Yes, “pi is between 3 and 4″ is another truth.
Michael Leibman wrote:
piflorie wrote:
Michael Leibman wrote:I like the first version better. :)
correction”Sphere” has the sound “fear” in it.Is that true?
yup, I did.
Depends on your personality. I can perceive of a type of person who would be offended by that. No worries then.
☺ wrote:
The earth is approximately spherical.
I would agree normally. But nothing is objective(to me). I could call something that is cubic, or prism like a sphere. And seeing as you don’t see exactly what I see we could perceive them differently. Perhaps I don’t believe in spheres. If you look at microscopic levels and beyond most “spherical” things do have edges. Small, but still there
rowass wrote:
Michael Leibman wrote:
You could look at my profile and see what I wrote about itThis makes sense but it wasn’t exactly what I was looking for.
Yes — I didn’t remember what it was… it was me self-conconsciously trying to speak “truth” while considering the idea of truth, which leads to all these examples of a true thing rather than discussing what truth itself is.
This isn’t about the earth’s sphericalality. It is about the definition of
truth based on reason not fact.
Ken wrote:
☺ wrote:I would agree normally. But nothing is objective(to me). I could call something that is cubic, or prism like a sphere. And seeing as you don’t see exactly what I see we could perceive them differently. Perhaps I don’t believe in spheres. If you look at microscopic levels and beyond most “spherical” things do have edges. Small, but still there
The earth is approximately spherical.
The earth is approximately spherical, not exactly spherical. You don’t have to go down to the microscopic level to see that it is different from an exact sphere. “The earth is not an exact sphere” is another truth. But you do raise the point that it may be difficult to describe truth precisely using human language. That is, it’s not completely clear what “approximately” means in this context. But it’s truth that for some appropriate definition of “approximately,” the earth is approximately spherical.
Truth is a lisp for truce, like math is a lisp of mass. It is not really the unknowable absolute truth, just a peace treaty between our knowing mind and this existence we experience. True or false?
rowass wrote:
This isn’t about the earth’s sphericalality. It is about the definition oftruth based on reason not fact.
Truth is factual.
florie wrote:
Truth is beyond reason.
What then, is truth? Since you seem to know what it is
not
“Truth is not really the unknowable absolute truth,” you say?
it is true that i have a headache and that every sentence i type is the product of a mind with a really bad headache
florie wrote:
“Truth is not really the unknowable absolute truth,” you say?
I’d say that is true, but somewhat meaningless.
Truth consists of those conditions which prevail in the physical world.
Michael Leibman wrote:
florie wrote:I’d say that is true, but somewhat meaningless.
“Truth is not really the unknowable absolute truth,” you say?
Well it is what you said, in effect. :)
I don’t believe in “facts” or “truth”. Seeing as everyone is different with different perspectives I find that we can not know a truth. Also, I know I exist in some form but I do not know in what form that is. So the only truth I can accept is that I exist.
Michael Leibman wrote:
Truth is a lisp for truce, like math is a lisp of mass. It is not really the unknowable absolute truth, just a peace treaty between our knowing mind and this existence we experience. True or false?
This was what I was looking for.
Mathematical truth is really more problematic than physical truth, because it depends on your choice of axioms.
rowass wrote:
Michael Leibman wrote:This was what I was looking for.
Truth is a lisp for truce, like math is a lisp of mass. It is not really the unknowable absolute truth, just a peace treaty between our knowing mind and this existence we experience. True or false?
I like this too. :)
rowass wrote:
Michael Leibman wrote:This was what I was looking for.
Truth is a lisp for truce, like math is a lisp of mass. It is not really the unknowable absolute truth, just a peace treaty between our knowing mind and this existence we experience. True or false?
If you already made up your mind that truth is subjective, then why did you ask the question? You are so wrong about that. Just because someone believes something does not make it true; they could be wrong.
Truth is something that you experience yourself - like hunger. No one can explain and make you understand what hunger is - unless you starve and experience it yourself.
Truth is an experience not an intellectual exercises.
My 2 pennies worth!
- Man Anonymous
http://www.makarajyothi.com
If everybody in the world believes that the moon is square, that doesn’t make it true.
anonymom wrote:
Truth is something that you experience yourself - like hunger. No one can explain and make you understand what hunger is - unless you starve and experience it yourself.Truth is an experience not an intellectual exercises.My 2 pennies worth!- Man Anonymoushttp://www.makarajyothi.com
This is good, and seems the most true so far.