which is more destructive, a hydrogen bomb or a nuclear bomb?
long story, but i really have to know
This open post was written 3 months ago | V/U/S: 185, 23, 8 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post
Reciprocity (0)
Since writing this post kc335 may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. kc335 is a verified member, has been around for 1 year, 7 months and has 49 posts and 493 replies to their name.
Post Tags (6)
Replies (23)
Where were you?
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
kinda both the same thing, hydrogen proved to have a higher yeild
lol oh too late ;) welldone
ayc wrote:
kinda both the same thing, hydrogen proved to have a higher yeild
work by differnt processes one is fusion one is fission
This to prove it, look at the first on this page http://www.google.com/search?q=is+a+n…
ben_j_richard wrote:
ayc wrote:
kinda both the same thing, hydrogen proved to have a higher yeildwork by differnt processes one is fusion one is fission
I thought that we hadn’t achieved nuclear fusion yet….
I hydrogen bomb actually is a nuclear bomb. And an atomic bomb is a type of nuclear bomb that is less powerful.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/ind…
yeah but what we generally call ‘nuclear’, its like a-bomb, and hydrogen bomb.
we have acheived nuclear fision, but it uses too much power than we get outta it, basically (as a power source)
Either one would ruin your whole day.
Commander Ikari wrote:
ben_j_richard wrote:
ayc wrote:
kinda both the same thing, hydrogen proved to have a higher yeildwork by differnt processes one is fusion one is fission
I thought that we hadn’t achieved nuclear fusion yet….
yes me have done fusion loads of times its controled fusion we need to perfect
sry fussion (bad spelling sorry)
which is more destructive ..that would depend on who you ask and if they had been effected by any of them
ok, look, i dont know anymore, but the one we cant do, we do do, its just not practical yet. im dense, sorry.
pudsdesig wrote:
which is more destructive ..that would depend on who you ask and if they had been effected by any of them
very true, ask someone in Japan which bomb was more destructive. I would say the fission bomb has caused more damage.
Rico wrote:
pudsdesig wrote:
which is more destructive ..that would depend on who you ask and if they had been effected by any of themvery true, ask someone in Japan which bomb was more destructive. I would say the fission bomb has caused more damage.
Course, had it been a hydrogen bomb we dropped….
ok its fussion, i had to check. ITER is one of the reactors.
yeah and after intel reported they may want to sue for peace. hmmmmmmmmmm. but im not getting into that. NOT EVER!
They are both different names for the same thing. You probably mean Atomic Bomb.
The idea behind the Hydrogen bomb is to get a nuclear reaction through a combination of fusion and fission reactions at the nucleus level of an atom. The uranium and plutonium versions of nuclear bombs work solely on fission. So, if you are asking which is more destructive, a nuclear bomb or a Hydrogen bomb the answer is that they are the same thing. If you are asking what type of nuclear bomb is the most destructive the answer is widely believed to be the Hydrogen variant.
Invite Others to Help
A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.