Questions answered
If you have a question about life or death I will answer it here
This open post was written 2 months, 4 weeks ago | V/U/S: 117, 25, 6 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post
Reciprocity (0)
Since writing this post White Knight may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. White Knight is a verified member, has been around for 4 months, 1 week and has 47 posts and 248 replies to their name.
Post Tags (4)
Replies (25)
Where were you?
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
wot hapens afta death
You go onwards towards the awakening
Chaos decides
What happens when an force of infinite force and duration hits an unmoveable object?
When we die, if we still live on, if our lives start iver, how come we don’t remember who we were?
It leaves a dent
Because our lives depend on growth and this requires forgetfullness
White Knight wrote:
It leaves a dent
wrong, the object is unmoveable and therefore cannot be effected in any way that changes the objext (other that color, i suppose)
wrong, the object is unmoveable and therefore cannot be effected in any way that changes the objext (other that color, i suppose)[/quoteCommunation wrote:
[quote White Knight]It leaves a dent
wrong, you’re the questioner, not the answerer
Michael Leibman wrote:
Communation wrote:wrong, the object is unmoveable and therefore cannot be effected in any way that changes the objext (other that color, i suppose)[/quote
[quote White Knight]It leaves a dentwrong, you’re the questioner, not the answerer
wrong, you have just answered me, and therefore have created a paradox by defineing something that has lost is defenition in the defineing.
Communation wrote:
Michael Leibman wrote:wrong, you have just answered me, and therefore have created a paradox by defineing something that has lost is defenition in the defineing.
Communation wrote:wrong, the object is unmoveable and therefore cannot be effected in any way that changes the objext (other that color, i suppose)[/quotewrong, you’re the questioner, not the answerer
[quote White Knight]It leaves a dent
wrong, I failed to answer you by misusing the quoting function
Michael Leibman wrote:
Communation wrote:
Michael Leibman wrote:wrong, you have just answered me, and therefore have created a paradox by defineing something that has lost is defenition in the defineing.
Communation wrote:wrong, the object is unmoveable and therefore cannot be effected in any way that changes the objext (other that color, i suppose)[/quotewrong, you’re the questioner, not the answerer
[quote White Knight]It leaves a dentwrong, I failed to answer you by misusing the quoting function
correct.
I think.
okay then.
is the world really on the back of an elephant on an infinite stack of turtles? Or was it an infinite stack of elephants and one turtle?
the word “heterological”, meaning “not applicable to itself,” a heterological word?
Communation wrote:
the word “heterological”, meaning “not applicable to itself,” a heterological word?
and while im at it, the word ‘relative’ has relative meaning.
What is the meaning of life?
hahaha answer that one!
CorriRandom wrote:
What is the meaning of life?hahaha answer that one!
There is none. The meaning is for life to exist. We live, we die. That’s that.
Is there really a god? a lord? a jesus christ?
if so, what gender is he/she? or is he/she a spirit? is it an it?
when does my life end??
who are you to know all the answers to life questions?
White Knight wrote:
It leaves a dent
HAHAHA i love that! it makes sense. the object didn’t move, it just warped, and the force bounced and kept going, therefore both terms were still correct.
Hybrid Theory wrote:
White Knight wrote:
It leaves a dentHAHAHA i love that! it makes sense. the object didn’t move, it just warped, and the force bounced and kept going, therefore both terms were still correct.
the force could not keep going, its direction is constant. It would have had to move through the object, but the object couldent be effected in this way. It is a paradox that cannot be answerd. I asked it just to be annoying. Look it up on google :)
Communation wrote:
Hybrid Theory wrote:
White Knight wrote:
It leaves a dentHAHAHA i love that! it makes sense. the object didn’t move, it just warped, and the force bounced and kept going, therefore both terms were still correct.
the force could not keep going, its direction is constant. It would have had to move through the object, but the object couldent be effected in this way. It is a paradox that cannot be answerd. I asked it just to be annoying. Look it up on google :)
who says it can’t change direction? you just said constant force, changing direction does not take away its movement
but i get that its an unanswerable pardox, i was just being a smarta55
Invite Others to Help
A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.