yes there is and i got the warning to prove it….
Lets see, I will type analogies in my next post, consering political motives of some great nation of the world. No faul language, nor racial nor religious.
Free Tibet, Tibet should be independant.
it could be though, that I miss-spelled independant…
Tibet is like Bavaria Or Prussia take that away from Germany???????
George Bush should abdicate,
Independent…
Anyway, I think they like ppl to steer clear of things that might cause a lot of contention and lead to arguments.
dude! Tibet is above India! Ever heard of 7 years in Tibet? That is in the Himalayas.
Again take it away fom China !!!!Make this Himalyan Monk God earn his pension and bring him back to Tibet .Talking big fom England or anywhere else .Bludger…..
Also, censorship… Just saying.
Tibet was captured/liberated by the Chinese, Or at least put under Chinese governement in around the beginning of the 20th century.
Anyhows, there are disputes, saying that Tibet is an Ethinc minority or something of the alike, and wants to split of of China.
In General, people faction tend to declare independence. And usually violently shake of ties to their ‘original’ country. Tibet has long ago declared Independence, but is hasn’t been very succesfull in actually putting it to use. No wonder, of course, since they want to do it without violence. Then, they would be the first nation to do so…
I do not think there is. The warnings come when the insults begin in debates.
Prussia was an independet Country to and so was Bavaria….
Yes, true. But they never want to exclude themselves from their new country. They never re-declared independence.
well then Tibet has to learn to be included to China….as well as Taiwan….
? I think millions of people disagree. Are you willing to say, that Australia should have learned to be part of Britain, or Part of Holland? Should the Mexicans have learned to be part of spain? Should the Polish have learned to be part of Germany?
We cannot just say, that the nations borders should stay the way they are. Borders change all the time, and countries come and go. It isn’t the governements that make countries you know. It is the people in it. And at some moment, not even governements can change that…
Not only that,give Australia back to the Aborigine’s .Give the Indians ,what live on Reservations back there America. Schlesien back to GermanyGerman Booties still in russian and American Hands…List goes on….
This is little contradictive… You do want Australia, that was a country originally owned by Aboriginallies, to be given back to them?
But you do not want Tibet, that was once owned by Tibetans, to be given back from China?
This is not about concepts here, this is your choice of which country should be with whom. This is opinion, not conceptual discussion…
well you suppose seen The Berlin wall .nothing in the world could have stopped that.True the World was created without Borders ,no fences except the Oceans .Lets all take away every border in Existence of every country learn how to speak Esperanto and live happy ever after.Its like religion, one will never ever convince people there talking to a Wall.about Tibet, forget Tibet …
Governements come and go yes. And if we all unite there would be peace. But as long as people group themselves under whatever motives. They will say other groups are bad. And wars will arise again. It is silly but it is human.
Whether the war is between nations, or between chronically-white-sock-wearing people and chronically-blue-sock-wearing people. As long as we think we are different, there will be wars.
So, for as long as it conceirn us,
there will be wars.
Xeno Dragon edited this post 1 year, 1 month ago. Read the previous text »
Censureship?
I wonder, is there censureship on this site, that goes beyond faul language and abuse language?
Is there censureship on political motives? religious, or racial?
I’ll try the political one in the next post.
Commander Ikari