god help: OK Religous debate you want one? - Help.com

You can’t say that the basis for reality is the fact that you can’t “prove it wrong”. I believe that the universe was made by pink elephants on cocaine. Prove ME wrong.

Hey vilen long time no see

Vilén wrote:
You can’t say that the basis for reality is the fact that you can’t “prove it wrong”. I believe that the universe was made by pink elephants on cocaine. Prove ME wrong.

Silly man…. They were blue, not pink.

lol

haha

It was the pink elephants from delerium tremens.

The were blue because it was cold. They were pink at normal temperature. And hi zacharris - do I know you?

Yes, from along time ago, we exchanged a few words over someone who was curious about god.

zacharris1 wrote:
Yes, from along time ago, we exchanged a few words over someone who was curious about god.

Meh, I don’t remember.

Negative i will alow fellow christians to defend my claim, from now on i will not par take anymore.

Quitting already? Coward.

I am a Christian and I am not going to defend your claim. I believe it, but you decided to make a battle. At least stand for your beliefs.

no i’ll join the conversation later when you can’t tell who i am.

Anonymous wrote:
no i’ll join the conversation later when you can’t tell who i am.

zacharris

Smart

A civilised conversation about the Bible’s claims and the various view points of these would be more constructive.

Anonymous wrote:
Smart

Well, am I right?

no, no it’s a smart idea

Although true, the NIV Bible is not the complete Bible. Missing are the DEUTEROCANONICAL books.

The Deuterocanonical books are the seven books Tobit, Judith, First Maccabees, Second Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, and Baruch plus the additional texts in Esther and Daniel that are found in the Catholic Old Testament but not in the Hebrew canon.

The Hebrew canon is the list of books that comprise the present day Jewish Bible. These are called the protocanonical books. “Proto” means first whereas “deutero” means second.

Sixtus of Siena (152O-1569 AD) was a Biblical scholar and a Jewish convert to Catholicism. He was the first to call the seven additional books together with the longer editions of Esther and Daniel that the Christians had in their Old Testament the “Deuterocanonical” books, but when he did this, he did not intend that one list was more certain or more inspired than the other, but merely that there were two lists. Likewise, Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, 2 & 3 John, Jude, and Revelation are the Deuterocanonical books of the New Testament.

Thoose books are disputed

What of the Enoch (I think that is what it is called) It is referenced by Jesus, but it is not canonised, except in the Ethiopian Orthodox church.