Stepping walk.
I have a question for everyone.
If you walked one foot, you would have first had to halve walked 1/2 foot. I think we can all agree that this would be correct.
But to step 1/2 of a foot, we would have had to step 1/4 of a foot. Again this is correct.
The problem lies in this. To step 1/4 of a foot, again you first have to step 1/8 of a foot!
These numbers can be divided infinitely! Thus making it IMPOSSIBLE to walk one foot.
Does this make sense? And if not, PLEASE STATE WHY SO.
This open post was written 1 year ago | V/U/S: 164, 13, 4 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post
Reciprocity (0)
Since writing this post Nightowl may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. Nightowl is a verified member, has been around for 1 year, 11 months and has 207 posts and 2,636 replies to their name.
Post Tags (10)
Replies (13)
Where were you?
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
Nightowl invited 61 users to read this post 1 year ago.
ahh.. the zeno paradox.
It is measured by the start to the end. In one footstep, you dont walk the smaller distances until the larger distance has been completed because you still have the choice to take your foot back and not walk at all.
Well… except that the average human stride is between 2 1/2 feet-3 feet. Better to start with miles and work your way back.
Hahaha! Xeno responded to Zeno’s Paradox :)
Well, yeah. I happen to disagree with it, though. Like I said, the average human walks further than a single foot with each step. This might make sense for a millipede, but logically, it’s just a mathematical principal made to look like philosophy.
Xeno Dragon wrote:
Well, yeah. I happen to disagree with it, though. Like I said, the average human walks further than a single foot with each step. This might make sense for a millipede, but logically, it’s just a mathematical principal made to look like philosophy.
Yea :p I know its inapplicable in the real world (We all know its possible to walk a foot if you wanted). I just wanted to see what kind of responses I would get:3
Nightowl wrote:
Xeno Dragon wrote:
Well, yeah. I happen to disagree with it, though. Like I said, the average human walks further than a single foot with each step. This might make sense for a millipede, but logically, it’s just a mathematical principal made to look like philosophy.Yea :p I know its inapplicable in the real world (We all know its possible to walk a foot if you wanted). I just wanted to see what kind of responses I would get:3
I’m not dissing you or anyone who believes it, mind you. I, personally, dislike it because it’s poorly expressed in my opinion. I’ve hated it ever since I learned it in my college philosophy class.
Yeah like you can’t run a marathon because you’d have to pass the halfway point, but to get there, you’d need the quarter-way point. It’s a great theory that just doesn’t work in real life.
these are just terms of measurement. realistically, nobody is going to walk in 1/8 of a foot increments. or 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, and so on and so forth. it is merely impossible to put those types of numbers into a single step.
mills wrote:
these are just terms of measurement. realistically, nobody is going to walk in 1/8 of a foot increments. or 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, and so on and so forth. it is merely impossible to put those types of numbers into a single step.
But everybody does have to go half way before they go all the way! Thats what makes this so trippy!
Think about it, your not “walking in increments”.
Maybe a better analogy would be…
To throw a ball from the pitchers mound to home plate, after you threw the ball it doesn’t just teleport from point A to point B. First it has to travel half of the distance (for if it NEVER travels half of ANY distance, it didnt move at all!) before it reaches its goal. But to first travel it has to FIRST travel half of a half! ect. ect.
Understand?
It only travels half of a distance if it makes it the full distance.
By saying it has to go half of half of half, etc. then that is no movement, but the thing is, the ball does make it and it has travelled all those halves to get where it is going because it is only half if it makes it the full way.
With no movement, there is no distance. With no distance, movement becomes irrelevant making this into a metaphysical discussion about concepts that don’t really matter.
Bogdan wrote:
It only travels half of a distance if it makes it the full distance.By saying it has to go half of half of half, etc. then that is no movement, but the thing is, the ball does make it and it has travelled all those halves to get where it is going because it is only half if it makes it the full way.
With no movement, there is no distance. With no distance, movement becomes irrelevant making this into a metaphysical discussion about concepts that don’t really matter.
Good answer!
Invite Others to Help
A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.