writing help: Luck of the Irish, - Help.com

ive never actually heard of it, sounds really interesting tho. i think you will find everything you need to know about it on the internet, im actually going to look into it too haha,

and thanks for calling me th smartest person you could think off lol.. how you came to that conclusion ill never know. :)

http://pesn.com/Radio/Free_Energy_Now…

http://www.nuscam.com/perendev.htm

http://canadianwind.net/perendev.html

those are a few interesting links, check them out and here is a you tube vid about it.

[youtube:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=PFGiWiXMHn0]

Josh McCool wrote:
http://pesn.com/Radio/Free_Energy_Now…

http://www.nuscam.com/perendev.htm

http://canadianwind.net/perendev.html

those are a few interesting links, check them out and here is a you tube vid about it.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=PFGiWiX…

Interesting, I have to say I have never heard of it. You day that it produces more energy than what is put in to it, correct? If so then it is either converting matter to energy or it does not exist.

According to the laws of thermodynamics energy cannot be created, it can only be converted into matter or less useful energy. This is why a perpetual motion machine is impossible in our universe.

say*

Also I should have said that it is a fraud; not that it does not exist.

it is a fraud, i was looking into it.
it apparently uses carefully arranged magnets to use their magnetic fields to push a motor, to create energy. its all bollocks of course but interesting non the less.

im sorry luck of the irish, butthat breaks a physical principle and unitarity. Basically in easy terms energy can never be created or destroyed only changed as im sure you know. So it is impossible to get energy from nothing. There are many things claiming like this but its not true you can never get more energy than you put in on anything.

hope this helps, any more questions let me know

In Life as in Technology you will only get as much, as you put in to it.I think my little German Brain has been taught this, from when i was still on Breast Milk.But wishful thinking.Its the Same as in the Cern Experiment .Scientist should know better. A waste of mega $$$$. Nice to have Money to play with..

how do you prove something that proven to be disproven?

the theory or principle of anything is to create one cell or one something and duplicate or clone it, regardless what matter is used .Think of 2 equal lines like an angel.Now make one line longer and you have a Leaver and make longer again and you could move the Earth .Archimedes Principle..Same with one Cell.But what to use ????

wow… thanks for the invite, but out of my league. I leave the mechanical stuff to those that know it. Writing however is a different story. I found a nice little peice of software that helps me a great deal in collecting my thoughts. It’s called inspiration and can be found at http://www.inspiration.com/Inspiration

You can even download a trial version for testing. FYI, I also use it for goal planning :)
Bright blessings ~ Richard

it was not completely a fraud.
it was not giving out more energy, just really close to it.
there are not a whole lot of truthful articles out there about it.
i will try and look up something for you though

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFGiWi…
a video of one. kinda hard to tell, but it is just two magnets pretty much
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ooa8EB…
http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/P…
http://www.nuscam.com/perendev.htm
this last site debunks them, explaining how the magnets can wear down and such

http://www.fdp.nu/perendev/

hi Luck of the Irish did you solve your questions or do you still have some??

ok i take it back ..

well i havent reviewed it fully but their premmise is that it works by magnets right. so there are a few things conservation of energy and the law of electromagnetic induction, by faraday especially paying attention to the correction to it by lense.

if you need specifics let me know

electroweak theory definatly not, laws of matter not much point laws of energy yes and magnetic induction yes not higgs boson.

magnetic flux is included in the laws of induction a change in flux induces a current in a wire

ummm google him??

who is he??

dont know of him sorry

lol haha. no id stick to what i said im off to bed now seeya

I’m sorry I can’t help with the technical side of things..

But your essay should be an interesting one. It seems that there are those that believe it can, and those that believe it can’t work..

So, begin by outlining the history of it. Who invented it, who is marketing it, who is backing it..

Then explain the theory behind it.

Now, give the arguments “for” using terms like “in theory, in principle…”

And against using terms like “in reality,” “the theory is disproven by”… etc.

Summarise with your opinion and talk about possible future development/improvement. What would be necessary to eliminate the negatives?

I hope this helps.

If not, just lock me back up the cupboard !