GRR! - Help.com

….no idea what you just said….

Each line in a molecular orbital diagram represents a molecular orbital, which is the volume within which a high percentage of the negative charge generated by the electron is found. The molecular orbital volume encompasses the whole molecule. It can be assumed that the electrons would fill the molecular orbitals of molecules like electrons fill atomic orbitals in atoms.

What is it you need.

not being able to be understood by others is handy in research sometimes. Its a code so others can’t steal work and its a lingo, so others in the hood can know how cool you are.

Are you at ANU by any chance? There are some people who talk crazy talk thats sounds a bit like that around there. They all ride these weird tall bikes and make rude jokes.

They are working on quantum computing and managed to get a stable nucleus for 70sec which is freaking huge!

that was his claim. Was a 1000fold increase he said. I’ts not my feild, but it sounded cool. I’m trying to do some background reading to be able to understand what the hell that means in real terms

Good luck with finding what you need to find mate. I have a bit of a chemistry background, so maybe I can help with your question. Could he be referring to sigma and sigma*? Like this… http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/…

did you expect anyone to be able to really help? I thought you were just venting some frustration. I’ll stay subscribed to this post, be cool if someone really could help

I don’t know, but I find I learn far more if I guess and then find out the answer.
so,
1. Constant scale - being able to use the same units accuratly across time and distance.
2. Heisenberg - to measure it, we change it.
3. Perspective - the measurer can never be objective

WIN! Happy about that. 2 out of three. So whats the more precise/accurate/accepted answer?

about #1. I just made it up. I was trying to think about the problem of communicating the measurement, even if its to yourself in the future, so you can compare it to the next thing you measure.

eg, will the couch fit through the door? measure door, measure couch. you have to be sure the tape hasn’t changed in that time. This becomes challenging when measuring less quantifiable things, and when communicating that to another across language. This making sense? is their a simple principle that captures this succinctly?

Oh, another one is defining the rule. A shock report was realised today about the number of abused kids in town, but looking closer, it included “verbal abuse” which you can’t really nail down.

I would totalyyy help you!…i swear i would but i have no idea what your talking about perhaps giving the actual name of the anti body things would help i have a specialty in hunting down all their is on the web.. (:

just kidding, i just realized u posted this like a billion years ago i hope u found the stuff u were looking for though.

Say what…….???????????