president help: EVALUATION ON PRESIDENT BUSH ARGUMENT ABOUT THE NATIONAL GUARD AND BORDER PATROL - Help.com

EVALUATION ON PRESIDENT BUSH ARGUMENT ABOUT THE NATIONAL GUARD AND BORDER PATROL

FOR MY CLASS WE HAVE TO EVALUATE THE SPEECH THAT PRESIDENT BUSH GAVE ON MAY 15, 2006, REGARDING THE NATIONAL GUARDS AND THE MEXICAN BORDER. i NEED TO FIND OUT THE PREMISES AND MISSING ASSUMPTIONS, FIND OUT IF THE PREMISES ARE FALSE, IS THERE ANY MISSING INFORMATION THAT WOULD WEAKEN OR STREGTHEN THE ARGUMENT, AND ALSO IF THERE ARE ANY FALLACIES.

HERE ARE THE TRANSCRIPTS
THE PRESIDENT: Good evening. I’ve asked for a few minutes of your time to discuss a matter of national importance — the reform of America’s immigration system.

The issue of immigration stirs intense emotions, and in recent weeks, Americans have seen those emotions on display. On the streets of major cities, crowds have rallied in support of those in our country illegally. At our southern border, others have organized to stop illegal immigrants from coming in. Across the country, Americans are trying to reconcile these contrasting images. And in Washington, the debate over immigration reform has reached a time of decision. Tonight, I will make it clear where I stand, and where I want to lead our country on this vital issue.

We must begin by recognizing the problems with our immigration system. For decades, the United States has not been in complete control of its borders. As a result, many who want to work in our economy have been able to sneak across our border, and millions have stayed.

Once here, illegal immigrants live in the shadows of our society. Many use forged documents to get jobs, and that makes it difficult for employers to verify that the workers they hire are legal. Illegal immigration puts pressure on public schools and hospitals, it strains state and local budgets, and brings crime to our communities. These are real problems. Yet we must remember that the vast majority of illegal immigrants are decent people who work hard, support their families, practice their faith, and lead responsible lives. They are a part of American life, but they are beyond the reach and protection of American law.

We’re a nation of laws, and we must enforce our laws. We’re also a nation of immigrants, and we must uphold that tradition, which has strengthened our country in so many ways. These are not contradictory goals. America can be a lawful society and a welcoming society at the same time. We will fix the problems created by illegal immigration, and we will deliver a system that is secure, orderly, and fair. So I support comprehensive immigration reform that will accomplish five clear objectives.

First, the United States must secure its borders. This is a basic responsibility of a sovereign nation. It is also an urgent requirement of our national security. Our objective is straightforward: The border should be open to trade and lawful immigration, and shut to illegal immigrants, as well as criminals, drug dealers, and terrorists.

I was a governor of a state that has a 1,200-mile border with Mexico. So I know how difficult it is to enforce the border, and how important it is. Since I became President, we’ve increased funding for border security by 66 percent, and expanded the Border Patrol from about 9,000 to 12,000 agents. The men and women of our Border Patrol are doing a fine job in difficult circumstances, and over the past five years, they have apprehended and sent home about six million people entering America illegally.

Despite this progress, we do not yet have full control of the border, and I am determined to change that. Tonight I’m calling on Congress to provide funding for dramatic improvements in manpower and technology at the border. By the end of 2008, we’ll increase the number of Border Patrol officers by an addition

This open post was written 3 years, 6 months ago | V/U/S: 200, 1, 1 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Subscribe to Replies | Report Post


Reciprocity (0) Reciprocation Failure -- The poster has NOT helped anyone else yet!

Since writing this post Mari_Esca may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. Mari_Esca is a verified member, has been around for 3 years, 6 months and has 1 posts and 0 replies to their name.

Post Tags (6)

Replies (1)

Where were you?

Click and drag to move the map around. FAQ: How we place people on this map »
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happenDisable Post Maps or Hide Yourself
Mouse over the map for 2 seconds to see an expanded, interactive view

C.M.Theisen offline Verified User (3 years, 4 months) Long Term User Shouts: 2 Add Friend #
Providence, RI, US | 3 years, 6 months ago (17 hours, 41 minutes after post)

If you want learn about arguments that either strengthen or weaken the arguments made in this speech, a good place to start is with the commentaries of political bloggers. They love to list out the pros and cons of speeches. I collected a few links to evaluations of the president’s speech. If you review the opinions I bet you’ll put out the pro and con points you need for your paper.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/00…
http://time.blogs.com/daily_dish/2006…
http://bullmooseblogger.blogspot.com/…
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/arch…
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/051…
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/051…

I also recommend you check out the Washington Post website: http://www.washingtonpost.com
You may have to register, but it is free. It’s an excellent source of political opinion on this kind of stuff. Do a search for “immigration speech” and read the columns by the mix of conservative and liberal commentators.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Post as sanjayrestle200 (No? Logout)

Invite Others to Help

Don't know the answer to this post, but know someone who might? Invite them to reply!

  • We send them a link to this post with your message and a post excerpt
  • We will NEVER use their email for anything else
  • Your invitation message is confidential
  • When your friend visits from the email, you'll be automatically joined on your Friends lists!
  • We still forward a link for your post to the post author and any repliers, just like if you had replied to the post yourself.

Your friend must be 13 or older to participate