Logic would say that, just because we live on a planet, that - Help.com

original AKS
offline Verified (2 years, 8 months) Visit original AKS's shoutbox
An Unknown Location

Logic would say that, just because we live on a planet,

that orbits a star, and there are millions of stars, some with planets, that does not mean there is life on those planets, even if conditions were the same.

Logic tells us that with all the millions of stars with planets orbiting them, there must be life on some other planet out there

Logic…its like the Duct tape of figuring stuff.

This open post was written 8 months, 3 weeks ago | V/U/S: 323, 10, 1 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post


Reciprocity (0) Reciprocation Failure -- The poster has NOT helped anyone else yet!

Since writing this post original AKS may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. original AKS is a verified member, has been around for 2 years, 8 months and has 202 posts and 6,457 replies to their name.

Post Tags (0)

This post has no tags. Please, help out and add some! (How Tags Affect Reciprocity)

Replies (10)

Where were you?

Click and drag to move the map around. FAQ: How we place people on this map »
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
Mouse over the map for 2 seconds to see an expanded, interactive view

ƒɍȧḉԎȧɫ online Verified User (10 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 290 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (1 minute after post)

I think it is more statistics rather than logic.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Shepherd offline Verified User (11 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (2 minutes after post)

It’s considered mathematically impossible for life on earth to be the only sentient life in the universe. They’ve known this for quite a while.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Shepherd offline Verified User (11 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (5 minutes after post)

Moreso, if there were a hypothetical planet with EXACTLY the same conditions, terrain and environment as earth; logic would dictate that life would follow the exact same evolutionary process. The chances of that happening in reality are astronomical though - but it is theoretically possible that we’re not the only human race in the universe. Interesting thought.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
ƒɍȧḉԎȧɫ online Verified User (10 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 290 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (8 minutes after post)

It’s statistically improbable; not impossible that Earth is the only planet inhabitant with life forms. It is not definite that life does exist elsewhere simply for the fact that we have never observed it. All we can ever say until we observe life elsewhere is to say that it is very probable it exists.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Shepherd offline Verified User (11 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (10 minutes after post)

fractal.scatter wrote:
It’s statistically improbable; not impossible that Earth is the only planet inhabitant with life forms. It is not definite that life does exist elsewhere simply for the fact that we have never observed it. All we can ever say until we observe life elsewhere is to say that it is very probable it exists.

They’ve observed it on Mars and Titan, microscopic though it may be.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
ƒɍȧḉԎȧɫ online Verified User (10 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 290 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (13 minutes after post)

Shepherd wrote:
They’ve observed it on Mars and Titan, microscopic though it may be.

No they haven’t. They’ve observed many phonemena and conditions that indicate life may have been present. They still have not observed any life yet or have overwhelming evidence that it once existed. Other than the fact that it was possible (on Mars at least).

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Shepherd offline Verified User (11 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (18 minutes after post)

Apologies about Mars, they found evidence of life as you said; I was remembering it wrong. It wasn’t Titan either, it was Enceladus:

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy…

But they think fishlike lifeforms are living on Titan. I’m trying to find the article on that.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Dr. Ralph offline Verified User (1 year, 1 month) Long Term User Shouts: 64 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (25 minutes after post)

What’s your point? Logic tells me we are not the only life form in the universe, intelligent or otherwise. We’re still undecided about the intelligent part.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
ƒɍȧḉԎȧɫ online Verified User (10 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 290 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (25 minutes after post)

Yeah Enceladus adds itself to somewhere else in the Solar System where microscopic life can be found. I think the best chances for macroscopic life are Europa and Ganymede (and possibly Callisto).

The Saturnian system has proved much more interesting than imagined as a result of the Cassini mission. I am still very sure that the guys at Imperial don’t beleive there to be life though.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Shepherd offline Verified User (11 months, 2 weeks) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Unknown Location | 8 months, 3 weeks ago (27 minutes after post)

I’m just recalling what I’ve read on the topic before. The Fish theory was undoubtedly American. But its all a step forward from the earlier believe that life could only possibly exist on Earth.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Invite Others to Help

A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.