microsoft help: For all of you hard-core PS3 fans, get this strait- - Help.com

wth..

ummm… we can play online with 250 ppl in one game for FREE (well… when MAG comes out in november)

oh… and we have 8 processors…

and i think youre just a little jealous of the fact that your little white lunchbox never comes out with any good games… EVER.

thanks for making us nintendo fanboys look bad, go choke on a lizard.
i enjoy all game systems, but when i want fun for y cash i pick up games like F- zero and punch out!! I dont care about the graphics or PP or any of that stuff, that isnt what makes a game intuitive and fun, It’s what companies DO with the power that defines the game.
nintendo has always given me the best possible games on their software.
sony and microsoft have good games, but not of their own creation so to speak.
I am a fanboy of nintendo as a developer of games, not a system spec company.
LitTle big planet is a great example.
I Hate most of the current PS3 games, but this game defines the possibilities in one package.
you can show me all the shiny Ferraris with super powered engines, but without gas and a driver it goes nowhere.
games are the gas, we are the drivers.
it is up to developers to give us something to use and it is up to us to use it.
think before you go on about how much better one system is, because CPU doesnt make the system anymore than good games.
you need a balance.
the NES is like my minimum for graphics and power, but it still has more fun games than my new xbox when it comes right down to it.
that doesnt make the NES better, because the 360 has more potential, power and graphics, which can balance the spectrum and make me still play the system.

now that I have said that, allow me to dismantle your crappy excuse at a post.

Anonymous wrote:
Now, I know what your thinking…Not gonna say it because your proboly spazing out now, and cursing. But I just wanted to let you know how your crap-load of a “consol” you have.

first off, get spell check.
secondly, MGS$ and LBP would like to have a word with you, not to mention the blu- ray player, which is pretty nice on it’s own.

Anonymous wrote:
First, Sony’s PlayStation might not have existed because of Universal. This is they tried to sue Nintendo for Royalty on all of the Donkey Kong Arcade Machines because they thought DK was actualy King Kong. They would have then TAKEN OVER NINTENDO if they had won. However, we won, and we PWND. So, that put us on the map as an actual company.

This has nothing to do with sony’s inevitable existence as a games producer. and Nintendo was put on the map not by the lawsuit, but by the arcades themselves, which were massively popular and later sprang out ideas of having one in your home.
even then, atari and colecovision was springing forth before the NES, the NES simply gave a better push thanks to the inclusion of the ROB, which they used as a toy.
even before all of this, Nintendo ran a games store and then some love hotels in japan, which all failed eventually.
and don’t say “we”, you sad sad man. you are just a pimple on the back of Nintendo, they are way bigger than you could be, not to mention you are probably like 13 with no real memory of the NES before the age of 10

Anonymous wrote:
Now, then Sony (and Phillips, but I don’t wanna get into a CD-i rant) and Nintendo were working together to make a CD-based ad for the SNES (Super Nintendo Entertainment System for all of you Sony noobs) around 1990. Sony then got pissed at something, took all of it’s information (and alot they learned from Nintendo) and made the Play Station.

Sony did not get pissed, Hiroshi Yamauchi of Nintendo did. he noticed that the contracts signed by nintendo and sony gave allmost all of the power to sony, which he disliked. he destroyed the contracts in secret to sony, left sony with nothing but their own designed technology and left to the headquarters of Phillips.
This devestated Sony by the time they had discovered it, and the they even considered quitting, but instead they decided to build with what they had made so far and thus gave birth to the PSONE.
It was all their technology and a **** move by nintendo to leave so suddenly.

Anonymous wrote:
So, if you need a simpler answer- Play Station 1s are just SNES CD-ad ons!!!! PS2s are N64!!! PS3 IS JUST CRAP BECAUSE IS DOESN’T HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD ON TO BECAUSE IT SUCKS THAT MUCH!

PS ones are the offspring of a company left on their own after trying to devise a Snes CD add on, which would have been about the same quality should it have been created,which it wasnt, making the PS1 more than three times the power of Snes. N64 was made to counter the PS1, but in a few years time they progressed enough to beat out that, which led to the gamecube and eventually the Xbox.

Anonymous wrote:
hahaha thats a new one, frankly i’m not a fanboy at all, i’m a hardware nut. the faster the better, and name a PS1 game that you didn’t like? Final Fantasy kicked *** .. besides if it werent for the ps1 modern 3D games wouldn’t exist.

all of the shovel ware third party crap for example.
nintendo wouldhave evtually reached 3d with or without the sony, but it would have taken longer to reach where we are

the faster the better, but you still need the fuel to move at all.
would you buy a game system with a 5 billion GHz even if it had only three games, all of which sold for a quarter of the ridiculous price of the system itself?
would you buy a Ferrari without a gas tank?

tl;dr

i just believe they are like….two companys who want to be better than eachother.
like..KFC and Mcdonalds for example.
Stop argueing which is better.

keeranjaso wrote:
i just believe they are like….two companys who want to be better than eachother.
like..KFC and Mcdonalds for example.
Stop argueing which is better.

its called competition. its a necessary part of business other wise we as consumers lose

oh.sorry.just expressing my opinion

keeranjaso wrote:
oh.sorry.just expressing my opinion

i wasn’t disagreeing, i was just giving you a single word to describe what it is you are talking about.
which is correct for the most part