Computers help: COMPUTER SLOWER AFTER REPLACING MOTHERBOARD - Help.com



This post left anonymously

COMPUTER SLOWER AFTER REPLACING MOTHERBOARD

I recently replaced the motherboard in my PC. I was running a Pentium D 915 @ 2.8Ghz, 2×1GB @ 667Mhz Single Channel RAM with an 8800GT 512mb on Win XP Home. The motherboard was a cheapy Abit SG-95 with 800Mhz FSB. I bought an Asus P5N-D not so long ago to find that one of my RAM sticks wont work in it, so I’m only running 1GB RAM, but the other components are the same. I notice the machine running SUBSTANTIALY slower! I know that there is only 1GB of ram, but I ran it in the past on only 1GB of ram on my old motherboard and remmeber it to be faster than it is now! I am thinking about buying a dual channel RAM kit as the board does have the dual channel capability. But will this really solve my problem? Is there likely to be something in the BIOS that i can change to make it run as fast as it did before with 1GB ram on my old motherboard? All replies will be greatly appreciated.

This open post was written 5 months ago | V/U/S: 196, 12, 2 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post


Reciprocity (0) Reciprocation Failure -- The poster has NOT helped anyone else yet!

Since writing this post Anonymous may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days.

Post Tags (9)

Replies (12)

Where were you?

Click and drag to move the map around. FAQ: How we place people on this map »
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
Mouse over the map for 2 seconds to see an expanded, interactive view

Anonymous edited this post 5 months ago. Read the previous text »

COMPUTER SLOWER AFTER REPLACING MOTHERBOARD

I recently replaced the motherboard in my PC. I was running a Pentium D 915 @ 2.8Ghz, 2×1GB @ 667Mhz Single Channel RAM with an 8800GT 512mb on Win XP Home. The motherboard was a cheapy Abit SG-95 with 800Mhz FSB. I bought an Asus P5N-D not so long ago to find that one of my RAM sticks wont work in it, so I’m only running 1GB RAM, but the other components are the same. I notice the machine running SUBSTANTIALLY slower! I know that there is only 1GB of ram, but I ran it in the past on only 1GB of ram and remmeber it to be faster than it is now! I am thinking about buying a dual channel RAM kit as the board does have the dual channel capability. But will this really solve my problem? Is there likely to be something in the BIOS that i can change to make it run as fast as it did before? All replies will be greatly appreciated.

spiratec9 offline Verified User (1 year, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 2 #
Burnaby, BC, CA | 5 months ago (50 minutes after post)

it not the amount of ram.
The ram speed maybe a problem.
Make sure your new motherboard supports that type of ram.

Do control/alt/del and look at what things are running
it should show 99% of cpu being used by the idle process.
If its less say 60% then see what program is using up that cpu power.
try closing that program and check the speed.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
spiratec9 offline Verified User (1 year, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 2 #
Burnaby, BC, CA | 5 months ago (51 minutes after post)

its called “system idle process”

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Anonymous #
5 months ago (56 minutes after post)

spiratec9, in the motherboard instruction manual it says that it is compatible with 667 mhz i think up to 1066mhz aswell. when i turn on the computer, it says on the post screen that the ram is running at 667mhz (which it should be) and the cpu at 2.8ghz per core ( as it should be ). the system idle processes right now is at 95-98. i always try to make sure all un-necesary processes are not running. i notice things like games running slowly and ripping a cd with itunes very slow.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
spiratec9 offline Verified User (1 year, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 2 #
Burnaby, BC, CA | 5 months ago (1 hour, 23 minutes after post)

well it should run o.k. You have me stumped.the 95-98 seems o.k.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
spiratec9 offline Verified User (1 year, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 2 #
Burnaby, BC, CA | 5 months ago (1 hour, 25 minutes after post)

try updating the mother board drivers.
If you are running Vista then good luck.
I don’t like that system.its very resource intensive.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
spiratec9 offline Verified User (1 year, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 2 #
Burnaby, BC, CA | 5 months ago (1 hour, 26 minutes after post)

for Vista you may need 2 gigs of ram to make it happy.
God bless us all.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Anonymous #
5 months ago (1 hour, 52 minutes after post)

I know, it doesnt really add up does it? But good idea about the motherboard drivers, i will go look for them now. Thankyou for responding.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
This reply has been removed.
Anonymous #
5 months ago (2 days, 3 hours after post)

Running xp. I know it’s not neccesarily how much ram I have but I am thinking maybe the ram and or CPU arnt propely compatible with te motherboard , though according to the instructions they are. But maybe they are too slow? The old mobo had an fsb of 800mhz and this new one is 1066mhz or something. Also I updated the bios to the latest version and updatd mobo drivers. I’m not sure If this makes. Difference or not. Another thing is the motherboard supports sata 3gb/s and my hard drive is 1.5gb/s though the old board was also 1.5gb/s transfer rate.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
This reply has been removed.
Anonymous #
5 months ago (2 days, 16 hours after post)

Not really, most SATA hard drives nowadays can transfer 3gb/s with sata II

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Invite Others to Help

A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.