Grammer question: - Help.com



This post left anonymously

Grammer question:

In the sentence “Marlow responds to this by blowing the steamboat’s whistle.” Should “steamboat’s” have the apostrophe or not?

This open post was written 1 month, 1 week ago | V/U/S: 118, 6, 6 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post


Reciprocity (0) Reciprocation Failure -- The poster has NOT helped anyone else yet!

Since writing this post Anonymous may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days.

Post Tags (0)

This post has no tags. Please, help out and add some! (How Tags Affect Reciprocity)

Replies (6)

Where were you?

Click and drag to move the map around. FAQ: How we place people on this map »
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
Mouse over the map for 2 seconds to see an expanded, interactive view

Anonymous #
1 month, 1 week ago (13 minutes after post)

Look here…..

www.mantex.co.uk/samples/apo.htm

And you spelt grammar wrong….lol.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
vivzofwale offline Verified User (1 year, 1 month) Long Term User Shouts: 5 #
An Unknown Location | 1 month, 1 week ago (18 minutes after post)

yes it should.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
hughes.gra offline Verified User (2 months) Shouts: 4 #
An Unknown Location | 1 month, 1 week ago (30 minutes after post)

Yes. Please use an apostrophe. This shows possession i.e. That the whistle belongs to the steamboat.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Good ole boy offline Verified User (2 years, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 11 #
An Undisclosed Location | 1 month, 1 week ago (33 minutes after post)

Here are a few examples to help you remember where the apostrophe is needed.

“Jacob’s shoes are very cool.” The shoes belong to Jacob (singular: one person).

“I found the dog’s old bone buried in the backyard.” The bone belongs to the dog (singular: a single dog).

“Look at all of the sailors’ boats!” The boats belong to the sailors (plural: there is more than one sailor).

“The children’s dresses were pink and frilly.” The dresses belong to the children, but since the word children is already plural without having to add an “s” at the end, this is an exception.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Anonymous #
1 month, 1 week ago (45 minutes after post)

Just another twist to it all in case you aren’t confused enough. When showing possession with a plural proper noun that ends in an S already, there is no need to add an additional S, just an apostrophe.

“Do you see that new BMW over there? That’s Williams’ new car.” (Where Williams is a last name)

“You could also write: That’s the Williams’s new car.”

Both are correct.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
alex ^3 offline Verified User (2 years) Long Term User Shouts: 6 #
Philadelphia, PA, US | 1 month, 1 week ago (46 minutes after post)

mills wrote:
Here are a few examples to help you remember where the apostrophe is needed.

“Jacob’s shoes are very cool.” The shoes belong to Jacob (singular: one person).

“I found the dog’s old bone buried in the backyard.” The bone belongs to the dog (singular: a single dog).

“Look at all of the sailors’ boats!” The boats belong to the sailors (plural: there is more than one sailor).

“The children’s dresses were pink and frilly.” The dresses belong to the children, but since the word children is already plural without having to add an “s” at the end, this is an exception.

Actually, I think mills’s examples confuse the issue. (And yes, folks, when a name ends in an s, the correct grammatical usage is s’s.)

You don’t just use apostrophes to show possession with people (or dogs). Houses have fireplaces… and they are the houses’ fireplaces. A knife has a blade, and it is the knife’s blade. Cars have tires, and a car’s tires go round and round :) etc….

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Invite Others to Help

A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.