i just wrote an article for the school newspaper about the death of bin laden, what do you guys think?
The Political Courage of Barack Obama
When President Barack Obama decided to send in American troops deep into Pakistan in a sting operation to kill Osama bin Laden, there was only one good possible outcome: the death of the leader of al-Qaida. Any other outcome would be disastrous. American soldiers could be killed in vain. America could be accused of violating Pakistan’s sovreignty. Bin Laden could escape. A single mistake could have been the end of President Obama’s political career, assuring his loss of the 2012 Presidential election while further soiling America’s reputation overseas.
This was not a risk the President had to take. He had the 2012 election all but wrapped up with the Republican Party in disarray and their leading candidate a reality television star. Obama could have played it safe and taken the second term without taking the risk of going after the terrorist responsible for the September 11th attacks that claimed the lives of 3,000 American civilians. He could have done what almost any other politician would have done in his situation and protected himself. None of his peers would have blamed him for not taking the risk.
But President Obama took that risk. He promised in the 2008 campaign that he would take a chance at bin Laden even if he had to send troops to Pakistan to get him, and he was going to keep that promise.
It took eight months of careful planning with the armed forces, but on May 1st, 2011, six months shy of the ten year anniversary of September 11th, President Barack Obama told the nation that United States Armed Forces had, “killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.”
The political consequences be damned, President Obama took a huge risk in ordering this operation. Had he not taken the risk, he would have cruised to another election. Had the operation been a failure, he would have lost the next election in a landslide. However, the United States killed Osama bin Laden because of the political courage of its president, whose leadership should be an example to all future politicians who must learn that for America to be the ideal country we want it to be, its leaders must forget about political consequences and do what is truly right for its people.
This open post was written 2 years ago | V/U/S: 1,233, 34, 13 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post
Reciprocity (0)
Since writing this post classicrock1818 may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. classicrock1818 is a verified member, has been around for 4 years, 4 months and has 135 posts and 3,043 replies to their name.
Post Tags (10)
Replies (34)
Where were you?
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
classicrock1818 invited 40 users to read this post 2 years ago.
So now that he has eliminated the head guys of Afganistan and Iraq
is he going to leave now.
I like it, but it glorifies Obama too much. But I guess thats what you are looking for, with it titled “The Political Courage of Barack Obama”.
There are thousands of other people, and presidents, and factors that played a role too. I know that kindof destroys your whole article, but its just my opinion.
chevyluminaeuro wrote:
I like it, but it glorifies Obama too much. But I guess thats what you are looking for, with it titled “The Political Courage of Barack Obama”.
There are thousands of other people, and presidents, and factors that played a role too. I know that kindof destroys your whole article, but its just my opinion.
i understand that point completely and dont think they should be marginalized at all. however, the president would have carried all of the blame had the mission failed and therefor i think he should receive plenty of praise as well.
its meant to be an opinion piece btw
Ok, thats cool. I understand. I just wanted to give a response.
it seems to much like your calling obama a hero
I dont know if there are multiple spellings, but is “sovereignty” spelled wrong?
writing=life mostly wrote:
it seems to much like your calling obama a hero
:)
haha yeah i definitely misspelled that, good thing im not an editor anymore
It has been historical for leaders not to send in covert hit men
to pick on each other.Sort of an unwritten rule.
Killing a person like Bin Laden seems like a good idea on the surface
or is it a dangerous game.Don’t you think its about time to stop
the cat and mouse game all together.War should be obsolete by now.
It’s very good. I like it (: I agree with spirtaec9 when he says that there were lots of other people involved who could have been praised too, but if it’s an opinion piece like you said, then fair enough. Well done, it’s very good.
As an opinion piece, it’s good. It definitely gives your opinion.
I don’t agree with it but it isn’t a debate. :)
Well done. :)
Only someone in California thinks Obama has the 2012 election wrapped up. I know the East and West coasts will fall in line to kiss his a$$ but in fly over country he is not considered such a hero… How about a nod to the men in uniform who actually did the work and dodged the bullets?
The way you write and communicate with the reader is very good. But but the artical didn’t adds new idea or information for the readers. Note ( did you know that the U.S, established, and supported “al-Qaida army” in the 80s to fight and weaken the soviet union).
Dr. Ralph wrote:
Only someone in California thinks Obama has the 2012 election wrapped up. I know the East and West coasts will fall in line to kiss his a$$ but in fly over country he is not considered such a hero… How about a nod to the men in uniform who actually did the work and dodged the bullets?
agreed
To much of being biased.As a Writer or Reporter write only about what and how .Don’t ever glorify a President,regardless of who he made be.The Event, or just Politics.. They are ” Two ” different Subjects.Otherwise OK.
The Mummy wrote:
The way you write and communicate with the reader is very good. But but the artical didn’t adds new idea or information for the readers. Note ( did you know that the U.S, established, and supported “al-Qaida army” in the 80s to fight and weaken the soviet union).
yup. all praise ronald reagan.
and its an opinion piece, im the opinion columnist.
You didnt write an article, you wrote an essay, an opinion piece. Journalism is about presenting the facts in an unbiased and objective way so the reader can make up their own mind. What you have done here, is tell your readers what to think by way of your opinion.
So how do you back that up? what are your credentials that can lend weight to why anyone should listen to you?
bobosnickums wrote:
You didnt write an article, you wrote an essay, an opinion piece. Journalism is about presenting the facts in an unbiased and objective way so the reader can make up their own mind. What you have done here, is tell your readers what to think by way of your opinion.
So how do you back that up? what are your credentials that can lend weight to why anyone should listen to you?
its an opinion piece. op ed. thats my job on the newspaper.
Propagandist… ;) Same as all the news any more. Except FOX of course, which is fair and balanced.
Dr. Ralph wrote:
Propagandist… ;) Same as all the news any more. Except FOX of course, which is fair and balanced.
god do i hope that was sarcastic. did you see how quickly they cut away from the lady last night he tried to give credit to obama? thats not their own propaganda?
HA HA HA HA HA!!! I am glad you still have a sense of humor classicrock! They all have their own agenda. Trust no one.
The opinion piece is not bad, but could have been much better. Anyway keep writing and improving, and keep inviting me :)
Saying its an opinion piece doesn’t give your opinion any weight.
You haven’t cited any sources for your facts, nor quoted any scholarly opinion to give your own credence.
Your writing lends emotional drama for weight, but not much else. Make sure your readers know how you know your stuff, or most wont read it.
They’ll eat it up, he is preaching to the choir in Southern California. Oh and I hate to tell you this, but Obama’s approval rating is only 49%… at exactly this time in W’s term in office his was 89%. Clinton still beat him because of the sorry state of the economy. I’m sure our stellar economy will carry Obabma, though. NOT.
sorry, but there is no republican who could possibly take on obama. donald trump? please. people say he can run a business so he can run the economy but he runs his casinos into the ground. source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6556470/
another source on trump’s ‘great’ business skills, this one from 2009
Nobody had ever even heard of Barack Obama two years before the election. It was all about Hillary… really it is anyone’s game. I may even throw my hat in the ring.
i think people are going to hesitate before throwing their names in now because of the expected rise in obama’s approval rating. its another deterrent, especially when he is going to have a billion dollar campaign. literally.
People 45 and older now make up 51% of the voting age population. Obama isn’t a ’shoo-in’ by any means. :)
bobosnickums wrote:
He also has bad hair. very very bad hair
Now THAT’S the truth!
If I could vote in the States, Ralph, you’d have my vote.
As an opinion piece, it does its job.
US politics are so twisted and, occasionally, evil. I’ve got a good idea, let’s create and finance a terrorist organization. No! Wait! Even better, let’s put a dictator into power in a foreign country to ensure our interests are protected, to heck with the people and democracy!
Canada, on the other hand, is pretty fantastic. Comparably.
Man you know that’s right all that you said was nothing but the truth and i don’t think he would have taken that risk if he didn’t have too but all in all that was a good report.
Invite Others to Help
A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.