Experience help: closed - Help.com

closed


This closed post was written 1 year, 7 months ago | V/U/S: 517, 8, 4 | Edit Post | Report Post


Reciprocity (0) Reciprocation Failure -- The poster has NOT helped anyone else yet!

Since writing this post lizzybug7 may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. lizzybug7 is a verified member, has been around for 4 years, 2 months and has 262 posts and 643 replies to their name.

Post Tags (10)

Replies (8)

Where were you?

Click and drag to move the map around. FAQ: How we place people on this map »
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
Mouse over the map for 2 seconds to see an expanded, interactive view

southern_comfort offline Verified User (7 years) Long Term User Shouts: 178 #
An Undisclosed Location | 1 year, 7 months ago (5 minutes after post)

I’ll take German philosophers for a thousand, Alex.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Ahhotep offline Verified User (3 years) Long Term User Shouts: 10 #
An Undisclosed Location | 1 year, 7 months ago (27 minutes after post)

I kant help sorry.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Blest offline Verified User (2 years, 10 months) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Undisclosed Location | 1 year, 7 months ago (34 minutes after post)

A Priori:

Something is a fact, even though one has never experienced that fact. The sun shone down upon the earth before you were born. That knowledge is considered “a priori”.

Synthetic Proposition:

A synthetic proposition is what you might call “redundant”. It’s just a way of restating something, or defining something. The technical definition is that the proposition (what you are proposing) is contained within the subject of the proposition. In other words, if what you propose does not stay inside the subject, it is not synthetic.

To give an example, “All triangles have three sides.” That statement is a synthetic proposition, because “three sides” is one of the things that defines a triangle, or rather is contained within the definition of a triangle. It would also be a synthetic proposition to state “All triangles are shapes.” Again, the idea of “triangle” contains the idea “shape”.

So a Synthetic A Priori would be something like “All triangles have three sides.” One does not need experience to know that triangles have three sides, because by definition, it would not be a triangle if it did not have three sides.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Zirbel offline Verified User (2 years, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 4 #
An Undisclosed Location | 1 year, 7 months ago (1 hour, 4 minutes after post)

A good eassay about: “Kant’s Synthetic A Priori Judgments”: http://www.nutters.org/docs/kant-sap

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
lizzybug7 offline Verified User (4 years, 2 months) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Unknown Location | 1 year, 7 months ago (1 hour, 24 minutes after post)

Blest wrote:
A Priori:

Something is a fact, even though one has never experienced that fact. The sun shone down upon the earth before you were born. That knowledge is considered “a priori”.

Synthetic Proposition:

A synthetic proposition is what you might call “redundant”. It’s just a way of restating something, or defining something. The technical definition is that the proposition (what you are proposing) is contained within the subject of the proposition. In other words, if what you propose does not stay inside the subject, it is not synthetic.

To give an example, “All triangles have three sides.” That statement is a synthetic proposition, because “three sides” is one of the things that defines a triangle, or rather is contained within the definition of a triangle. It would also be a synthetic proposition to state “All triangles are shapes.” Again, the idea of “triangle” contains the idea “shape”.

So a Synthetic A Priori would be something like “All triangles have three sides.” One does not need experience to know that triangles have three sides, because by definition, it would not be a triangle if it did not have three sides.

thank you so much! :)

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
lizzybug7 offline Verified User (4 years, 2 months) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
An Unknown Location | 1 year, 7 months ago (1 hour, 25 minutes after post)

Zirbel wrote:
A good eassay about: “Kant’s Synthetic A Priori Judgments”: http://www.nutters.org/docs/kant-sap

haven’t had a chance to read it but i’m sure it will be helpful thankyoo!

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

lizzybug7 edited this post 1 year, 6 months ago. Read the previous text »

Anyone able to help me out with Kant?

I learnt his theory a good year ago but second time around i can’t seem to understand a priori:

Synthetic A Priori

We do not follow predetermined laws. However, we must act according to some laws, otherwise our actions are random and without purpose. As a result, rational beings must determine for themselves a set of laws by which they will act.

These laws are not analytic (true by virtue of their meaning), but they cannot be determined through experience (a posteriori). Hume pointed this out when he said that you couldn’t move from an is (a synthetic statement about the world) to an ought (a statement about the way the world should be). The rational being has to determine the synthetic a priori – the substantive rules that can be applied prior to experience.

if any one could explain that to me really simply that would be sooo great! :)

lizzybug7 closed this post.

This post has been closed, no more replies. Thanks!

Invite Others to Help

Seeing as this post is closed, no invites are allowed.