THE THEORY OF ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION
BY Big Al One
COPYRIGHT 2012, 2013

Before we can discuss the subject of antigravity propulsion, we must briefly look back at ourselves, our ancestry, our history and ultimately at the awe and wonder of space. Not just space but those mysteries and things contained within it. The sun, moon and stars, the galaxies and nebulas, the constellations - all things contained therein the embodiment of space. It has been a part of our past. It is certainly here, today in the present and it is not likely to disappear anytime in the near or far future to come. Space has played a major role in religions, in politics, in science and in a commercial market.
The trouble with the things we have discovered in space is not the things themselves. A planet or great nebula that does not have the means to support life, as we understand, should not hinder us to appreciate it as the artisan appreciates art. The actual problem, when we view these glittery diamonds of the night, is the vast distance of space between what we see and us.

What we will not delve into here are petty facts, such as light-years and the speed of light and theories that state that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The mere idea that variances of speed can be idealized anywhere from zero to infinite, reopens a door that is impossible to shut in the first place.
We know what the speed of light is because we can obviously see it. What is faster than light could very well be those things that we cannot see because they travel faster than light itself, already. Therefore, we do not necessarily know of its existence until we can see it, at the speed of light.
If we are to travel to one of those distance points in the universe within reasonable measure of time, we will have to travel at speeds far in excess of the speed of light.
The focus of the subject will be gravity as the likely force of faster than light travel. The mass quantity of gravity in space, known as a black hole, has the ability to bend light from its linear trajectory in the vacuum of space. Even though common science has deemed gravity the weakest of all known forces, the fact remains that it discourses light and therefore is strong by that fact.

What is gravity? This has always been a fundamental question of science. As such, science has measured and theorized all possible avenues it is aware of. Yet, as of today, scientists still do not understand how that gravity, so uniquely different from matter is found only in matter itself where all other forms of energy are found separately from matter. If we are to break the barriers to new understandings, where the things we attempt are genuinely new, we will have to start looking at avenues that are not common but are commonly looked away.
To embrace the technology and forsake the foundation of its principals would be very much like cavemen driving in modern day cars. This is known as a backward principal and directly demeans our current civilization.
All of known life must feed in order to exist. To eat, in order to be resolute. This principal applies from the most complex creatures, such as mammals to the smallest cells. As we study less complex creatures, we quickly understand that feeding and digestive processes become more simplified. In many cases changes in the way a cell would gain nutrition (as through the process of osmosis) is profoundly different than from more complex creatures as these process of simple creatures are increasingly simplified. The principal system becomes simplified as well.
All existing matter exists at a standard, universal rate, called “rate of existence.” When the rate of existence of matter is established, it is established into the field of space. Once established, matter must consume that given area of space, at the rate of existence, per second-per second. This understanding conforms to the laws of consumption.
Once an organism has fed, by-product is a result. Wherein said by-product of the organism must be removed, its digestive system provides the method in which that will occur.
Equally, the result of matter consuming space, results in the by-product of gravity, which is in direct accompaniment of matter producing it. The effect of gravity upon matter results in decay and existence of other interchanging energies. This conforms to the laws of entropy and a universe in decay.
It is clearly understood why gravity cannot be found apart, separately, than that from matter.
Gravity has a reach that extends beyond the object of matter. Practical observation of gravity suggests that it draws other objects (which too have gravity), to the greater mass.
An object falls to the ground. If it were not for the very surface of matter, the object would have fallen further. It becomes clear that the flow of gravity moves from the outside to the very core of the matter. It simply does not stop at the object’s surface.

Gravity continually flows from the outside of an object to the internal core of an object. If air, as an example, were continuously pumped into a tire with no system of release, it would blow up. The laws of interchanging energies prevent a continual build up of gravitational forces in objects of greater size and density. As gravity travels deeper toward the core of the object, great pressures are achieved causing thermodynamic radiation, or heat. The character of thermodynamic radiation moves contrary to the flow of gravitational forces, thus providing a relief of pressure from gravity.

An individual object, which rests on the surface of a greater object, has lost its individual gravitational field to a greater collective. If the individual gravity found within the smaller object were to retain its identity, it would act separately from the greater mass.
Because the nature of gravity draws from the outside to the inside, it would be ideal to harness a gravitational force that travels from the inside to the outside. With the supposition of antimatter (the direct opposite of matter), antimatter would contain a gravitational field which does just this, travel from the inside to the outside, hence antigravity. This is ideal because it provides a basis for propulsion.

Because of the fact, it is not readily practical to harness great quantities antimatter, alternate and reasonable substitutes must be looked at. Even if we were to succeed in harnessing great amounts of antimatter for it‘s antigravity, basic challenges would exist no differently than with the necessary substitute that can be acquired.
Centrifugal Force is a force of gravity that travels from the inside of an object, to the outside. As an object is rotated, gravitational forces at the meeting point, or core, become slightly deflected in angular degree. As an object is more intently rotated, the greater the deflection becomes at the core. At the same time, the reach of gravity beyond the surface of the object, shortens. As the object becomes rotated with ever-greater intensity, the gravitational force reverses 180 degrees, and flows in the opposite direction. Once the reach of gravity does not exceed the surface value of the object, and when the internal flow of gravity exceeds the surface value of the object, things located on the surface begin to fly off and minimal centrifugal force is accomplished.

In a maximum rotation of the object, gravitational forces continually flow from the inside to the outside. Much like the problem that exists from continuously filling a tire with air, nothing can continuously pour out from an object without end. Yet, a spinning object will continuously pour out a reverse gravitational field as it continuously rotates. The continuous rotation is not necessarily the source by which gravity is continuously emitted. The flow dynamic of centrifugal force suggests a looping effect by which two vortex fields form above and below the object rotated. These vortexes loop the emitted gravitational field back into the core of the object.

When an object, such as a top, spins, it throws a gravitational field outward in all directions. Because of this balance of equal forces, the top spins and remains confined to the space it spins in. This would be much like two jet engines facing each other at full blast. However, if we were to remove one jet engines away from the other the static results of these forces would dramatically change.
If only a portion of the gravitational field of the spinning top were weakened or changed, it is believed that the static results would dramatically change because the radiated force would no longer bear equal value.

Only a specific object is in direct control of it’s gravitational force. A separate object of matter, cannot of itself control the gravitational force of the other. Each object does well to control it’s own gravitational field. This is so in a natural or controlled state of the object. However, two gravitational forces can have influence, one to the other. Because of this, specific matter and it’s action can be manipulated. Neither the moon or the earth have effect to each other without the medium of interacting gravitational forces - as it is not the masses of matter in and of themselves which influence each other but by their fields of gravity.
Antigravity propulsion may very well be achieved through centrifugal force by the compliment of two rotating objects. If not, the principal of how the gravitational fields should interact is key to antigravity propulsion.
As an object, such as a sphere, rotates at high speeds, a full compliment of gravitational forces bloom. Here, the object spins on a horizontal plane. The gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. Above and below, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the sphere.

Here, a disk also spins on a horizontal plane. The same gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. As with the sphere, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the disc.

As mentioned before, two gravities may interact and influence each other. Being the case, it is highly possible to designate portions of one gravity field in turn that it may influence another gravity field to accomplish a specific result. The result desired in this case would be to weaken a portion of the gravitational field emitted from the sphere. The remaining gravitational field that is emitted would respectively be the thrust portion of the gravity field.
This is accomplished by turning the disc 90 degrees thereby introducing the disc’s vortex into the sphere’s horizontal radiance. The final result would be the vortex of disc swallowing up a portion of the gravity field emitted by the sphere. Furthermore, the sphere’s gravity would follow the same current path as the disc’s vortex to the disc’s core, Further yet, it is radiated out and away from the disc’s edge at 90 degrees.

The disc’s remaining vortex becomes the leading edge. Because it is a vortex, it too has vacuum-like qualities which may possess the ability to bend the fabric of space, itself.
The combining of these structures adds up to an engine not very much unlike a jet engine.
These simple concepts in proper sequence could very well provide the necessary means for travel in quantum space.
The future is now.
This open post was written 1 year, 2 months ago | V/U/S: 3,461, 76, 17 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post
Reciprocity (0)
Since writing this post . . . may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. . . . is a verified member, has been around for 3 years, 7 months and has 90 posts and 10,077 replies to their name.
Post Tags (7)
Replies (76)
Where were you?
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
IDK. I know you’ve been working it through for a long time though, and I am glad to see your determined. Heck, they’re finally getting around to making a battleship sized railgun that should shoot a slug 100 miles. If that can happen, I see no reason anti-gravity can’t.
Centrifugal force isn’t a real force; its a way of interpreting the apparent force outward in circular motion, but is really just due to a lack of sufficient centripetal acceleration required to maintain a circular motion. If there isn’t enough centripetal acceleration to constantly keep motion circular, movement occurs linearly which appears as a force outward from the circle.
Dr. Jackson wrote:
IDK. I know you’ve been working it through for a long time though, and I am glad to see your determined. Heck, they’re finally getting around to making a battleship sized railgun that should shoot a slug 100 miles. If that can happen, I see no reason anti-gravity can’t.
Yeah, I’ve posted about it a couple of times and I think I have a working solution in theory only. I just don’t know who or what foundation to turn to that I may present the case. The real trouble I have with the notion of scientific communities is that they like to intellectualize the most basic working principals away insted of lending any real support to the probablity.
Anonymous wrote:
Centrifugal force isn’t a real force; its a way of interpreting the apparent force outward in circular motion, but is really just due to a lack of sufficient centripetal acceleration required to maintain a circular motion. If there isn’t enough centripetal acceleration to constantly keep motion circular, movement occurs linearly which appears as a force outward from the circle.
The strength of a spinning object throws gravity to the outside, from the inside.
That much I do know. This is different from the same object when its realitvly stationary - the gravity falls from the outside to the inside. Observation alone should deduct this.
mindhealer wrote:
Levity is the opposite of gravity.
Hmm - that’s interesting. “Levity,” seems to be a word that is a close cousin to the word “Levitation.”
BIG AL ONE wrote:
mindhealer wrote:
Levity is the opposite of gravity.Hmm - that’s interesting. “Levity,” seems to be a word that is a close cousin to the word “Levitation.”
Yes. Like gravity is related to “gravitation”.
mindhealer wrote:
BIG AL ONE wrote:
mindhealer wrote:
Levity is the opposite of gravity.Hmm - that’s interesting. “Levity,” seems to be a word that is a close cousin to the word “Levitation.”
Yes. Like gravity is related to “gravitation”.
Well then, I should say that when an object of mass begins to spin in excess of its mass, it begins to approach a point of levity.
So, here’s a question based on a simple situation. If a balanced object spins, it throws out an even field of levity, in all surrounding directions. If a section of that field were neutralized, do you think the object would gain forward momentium?
~AGAPE~ wrote:
Wouldn’t that cause an imbalance in the motion and become unstable?
yes, but its deliberate and controlled in order to provide forward motion.
I don’t think centrifugal force is any different than any other type of motion. If you jump you are defying gravity in the same way. Maybe I just don’t get it, but that seems like standard physical motion as I was always taught that simple physics covers.
Then there are the strange things like trying to understand general relativity and reading along with how the theoretical physicists keep trying to reconcile it with quantum mechanics — i.e. come up with a theory of “quantum gravity”. I don’t know if they’ve come far on that, it’s just ideas from my childhood.
And then there is my nonphysical and also non-science-fictiony approach, which is spiritual and mystic, just like me (as proven in my picture), so things like http://www.amazon.com/Defy-Gravity-He… and also ideas deep in my mind like ” “Satan fell by force of gravity, by taking himself too gravely,”
Anyway. That’s the surface of my un-understanding. Gravity doesn’t seem too complicated unless you want it to be impossible or to advance the cutting edge of theoretical physics (which is really far from the realm of the standard model which seems to work on any normal realm).
BIG AL ONE wrote:
~AGAPE~ wrote:
Wouldn’t that cause an imbalance in the motion and become unstable?yes, but its deliberate and controlled in order to provide forward motion.
It sounds interesting, how would you control this?
~AGAPE~ wrote:
BIG AL ONE wrote:
~AGAPE~ wrote:
Wouldn’t that cause an imbalance in the motion and become unstable?yes, but its deliberate and controlled in order to provide forward motion.
It sounds interesting, how would you control this?
I’m going to draw a picture based on some actual experiences I had and experiences that other have had. I will scan it and upload to Tiny Pic so I can post link.
I have an idea that may cancel out a segment of gravitational flow from a spinning object. I feel this will also be a form of the control required in order to “stear” the potential object.
Sadly, I will begin my explanition from its genesis, but I promise (because I am not so smart, myself), to keep things understandable.
Okay, first some explanations.
I want to travel the vast distances of space in the least amount of time impossable.
The question remains, what force exists that can accomplish this. I’ve concluded, in order to travel faster than the speed of light, a force must be used that is stronger than the speed of light. Gravity, in quantifiable terms does this. Black holes bend light rays from an otherwise strait course in the vacuum of space.
Scientists still cannot conclude why gravity cannot exist apart from an object of mass. My feeling is this: in the most raw sense, the existance of an object in space must consume that space per-second, per-second in order to maintain its existance. In other words, object eats space. Likewise, object $h!t$ gravity
per-second, per-second according to its mass, size, density, etc. Thus, gravity.
The nature of gravity flows from the outside of the mass-surface, to it’s very core.
The theory of antimatter suggests that an object made of antimatter contains a gravity that naturally flows from the inside to the outside. That is a very desirable benefit if you want to use it as a propellant. But, just where in the heck are you and I going to get antimatter?
So, I look for a compatible equivelant. Centrifugal force. As an object of mass begins to rotate, a deflection of gravity occurs within the core, at acute angles.
The harder and faster it spins the less gravity is able to actually reach the core.
Harder and faster still, the arms of gravity begin to flow from the inside to the outside. On a planetary scale, it really does not take much rotation until objects on the surface begin to fly off its surface.
This is the simple explanition.
Now, you cannot continously put air into a tire, ceaselessly, without it exploding.
Likewise, gravity neverendingly pours into an object with mass. According to Einstiens principals of interchanging energies, as gravity passes through greater and greater mass densities, it creates heat (a form of energy which flows in the opposite direction of gravity). Thus, the pressure release.
In opposite view, gravity cannot forever flow outward from an object, continiously, without it somehow being fed, (thus my need for illustraition). Nonetheless, there is a closed-loop system involved with antigravational or centrifugal flow. Part of this closed-loop system involves two vortexes.
And basically, I’m saying a secondary spinning object with the antigravationl vortex could be used to cancel out the out-bound flow of gravity from the first object.
I’m going to begin my drawings, now.
Thank you for your patients.
http://oi42.tinypic.com/2re4j7o.jpg
Here is the rough drawing of what I’ve mentioned so far.
Sorry folks, it’s late for me and I will get back with
you for better explanations.
Gotta rack out.
id say 2 ways i think ther can be antigravity
one: the atoms of the object lose their energy and are just dead mass
two: have something of equal mass surrounding it creating a neutral gravitaional pull….but…
i hardly passed algebra so i wouldnt take my ideas seriously….
In that case think of a flying saucer, only start with the basics and start building.
Start with a disc, an old record player perhaps. Then glue a wall of cardboard around the edge ot he disc with no break in it.
Now place a small weight at the center of the disc. Now power the player up and watch the weight shoot across the disc and up the wall.
If it is a domed shape like a flying saucer it should in theory stop at the top of the dome or drop back down to the center of the spinning disc.
You now have to figure out how to use the weights to make the disc turn. This entails a wheel the weight drops or is guided onto the top of the wheel, this then turns the wheel. the wheel will need to have cogs or some kind of device atached to the disc. That will turn the disc around.
This is the basics of something I tried out a lot of years ago. I think it could work. I had a young family at that time and had to get extra work to keep it, I didn’t have the time to continue it.
I found a program you can use to reverse gravity. It is here: http://www.silvergames.com/gravity-guy The instructions say, “Left mouse click or press space to flip gravity.”
It’s pretty neat, you have to walk right-side up and upside-down.
. . . edited this post 1 year, 2 months ago. Read the previous text »
Real Antigravity?
I’ve given a lot of thought about real antigravity through the years and the closest I could come up with
is centrifugal force. But the thing with CG, is that, it throws its reverse gravity in all directions. My thought
is if a certain segment of the throw were lessened, or neutalized, you could get forward thrust of real
gravitional waves.
Possable?
I think sadly, in order to understand anti-gravity, you need to be able to visualize a separate dimension. A dimension that we do not have the brain capacity to understand, kind of like the true meaning of infinite. Be careful, every mathematician that ever studied infinite ended up driving himself crazy by the end!!
AnonymousHelper wrote:
I think sadly, in order to understand anti-gravity, you need to be able to visualize a separate dimension. A dimension that we do not have the brain capacity to understand, kind of like the true meaning of infinite. Be careful, every mathematician that ever studied infinite ended up driving himself crazy by the end!!
Well. . .It’s not like I’m looking for the divisible point of Pi.
mindhealer wrote:
BIG AL ONE wrote:
mindhealer wrote:
Levity is the opposite of gravity.Hmm - that’s interesting. “Levity,” seems to be a word that is a close cousin to the word “Levitation.”
Yes. Like gravity is related to “gravitation”.
Here’s another analogy for you.
gravity=crucifixion, levity=resurrection
mindhealer wrote:
mindhealer wrote:
BIG AL ONE wrote:
mindhealer wrote:
Levity is the opposite of gravity.Hmm - that’s interesting. “Levity,” seems to be a word that is a close cousin to the word “Levitation.”
Yes. Like gravity is related to “gravitation”.
Here’s another analogy for you.
gravity=crucifixion, levity=resurrection
lol!
Well. . .kinda!:P
. . . edited this post 1 year, 1 month ago. Read the previous text »
Real Antigravity?
I’ve given a lot of thought about real antigravity through the years and the closest I could come up with
is centrifugal force. But the thing with CG, is that, it throws its reverse gravity in all directions. My thought
is if a certain segment of the throw were lessened, or neutalized, you could get forward thrust of real
gravitional waves.
Possable?
http://oi39.tinypic.com/209qbs6.jpg
In the future we will move things with sound waves.
spiratec9 wrote:
In the future we will move things with sound waves.
We sort of do that now. Most of that is still in the experimental stage.
Along with many of the forces I thought of using, to travel beyond lightspeed factors, was the possability of sound.
The only trouble with that is sound does not convey in space.
. . . edited this post 1 year ago. Read the previous text »
Real Antigravity?
I’ve given a lot of thought about real antigravity through the years and the closest I could come up with
is centrifugal force. But the thing with CG, is that, it throws its reverse gravity in all directions. My thought
is if a certain segment of the throw were lessened, or neutalized, you could get forward thrust of real
gravitional waves.
Possable?
. . . edited this post 1 year ago. Read the previous text »
Real Antigravity?
THE THEORY
OF
ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION
BY
Big Al One
COPYRIGHT 2012
Before we can discuss the subject of antigravity propulsion, we must briefly look back at ourselves, our ancestry, our history and ultimately at the awe and wonder of space. Not just space but those mysteries and things contained within it. The sun, moon and stars, the galaxies and nebulas, the constellations - all things contained therein the embodiment of space. It has been a part of our past. It is certainly here, today in the present and it is not likely to disappear anytime in the near or far future to come. Space has played a major role in religions, in politics, in science and in a commercial market.
The trouble with the things we have discovered in space is not the things themselves. A planet or great nebula that does not have the means to support life, as we understand, should not hinder us to appreciate it as the artisan appreciates art. The actual problem, when we view these glittery diamonds of the night, is the vast distance of space between what we see and us.
What we will not delve into here are petty facts, such as light-years and the speed of light and theories that state that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The mere idea that variances of speed can be idealized anywhere from zero to infinite, reopens a door that is impossible to shut in the first place.
We know what the speed of light is because we can obviously see it. What is faster than light could very well be those things that we cannot see because they travel faster than light itself, already. Therefore, we do not necessarily know of its existence until we can see it, at the speed of light.
If we are to travel to one of those distance points in the universe within reasonable measure of time, we will have to travel at speeds far in excess of the speed of light.
The focus of the subject will be gravity as the likely force of faster than light travel. The mass quantity of gravity in space, known as a black hole, has the ability to bend light from its linear trajectory in the vacuum of space. Even though common science has deemed gravity the weakest of all known forces, the fact remains that it discourses light and therefore is strong by that fact.
What is gravity? This has always been a fundamental question of science. As such, science has measured and theorized all possible avenues it is aware of. Yet, as of today, scientists still do not understand how that gravity, so uniquely different from matter is found only in matter itself where all other forms of energy are found separately from matter. If we are to break the barriers to new understandings, where the things we attempt are genuinely new, we will have to start looking at avenues that are not common but are commonly looked away.
To embrace the technology and forsake the foundation of its principals would be very much like cavemen driving in modern day cars. This is known as a backward principal and directly demeans our current civilization.
All of known life must feed in order to exist. To eat, in order to be resolute. This principal applies from the most complex creatures, such as mammals to the smallest cells. As we study less complex creatures, we quickly understand that feeding and digestive processes become more simplified. In many cases changes in the way a cell would gain nutrition (as through the process of osmosis) is profoundly different than from more complex creatures as these process of simple creatures are increasingly simplified. The principal system becomes simplified as well.
All existing matter exists at a standard, universal rate, called “rate of existence.” When the rate of existence of matter is established, it is established into the field of space. Once established, matter must consume that given area of space, at the rate of existence, per second-per second. This understanding conforms to the laws of consumption.
Once an organism has fed, by-product is a result. Wherein said by-product of the organism must be removed, its digestive system provides the method in which that will occur.
Equally, the result of matter consuming space, results in the by-product of gravity, which is in direct accompaniment of matter producing it. The effect of gravity upon matter results in decay and existence of other interchanging energies. This conforms to the laws of entropy and a universe in decay.
It is clearly understood why gravity cannot be found apart, separately, than that from matter.
Gravity has a reach that extends beyond the object of matter. Practical observation of gravity suggests that it draws other objects (which too have gravity), to the greater mass.
An object falls to the ground. If it were not for the very surface of matter, the object would have fallen further. It becomes clear that the flow of gravity moves from the outside to the very core of the matter. It simply does not stop at the object’s surface.
Gravity continually flows from the outside of an object to the internal core of an object. If air, as an example, were continuously pumped into a tire with no system of release, it would blow up. The laws of interchanging energies prevent a continual build up of gravitational forces in objects of greater size and density. As gravity travels deeper toward the core of the object, great pressures are achieved causing thermodynamic radiation, or heat. The character of thermodynamic radiation moves contrary to the flow of gravitational forces, thus providing a relief of pressure from gravity.
An individual object, which rests on the surface of a greater object, has lost its individual gravitational field to a greater collective. If the individual gravity found within the smaller object were to retain its identity, it would act separately from the greater mass.
Because the nature of gravity draws from the outside to the inside, it would be ideal to harness a gravitational force that travels from the inside to the outside. With the supposition of antimatter (the direct opposite of matter), antimatter would contain a gravitational field which does just this, travel from the inside to the outside, hence antigravity. This is ideal because it provides a basis for propulsion.
Because of the fact, it is not readily practical to harness great quantities antimatter, alternate and reasonable substitutes must be looked at. Even if we were to succeed in harnessing great amounts of antimatter for it‘s antigravity, basic challenges would exist no differently than with the necessary substitute that can be acquired.
Centrifugal Force is a force of gravity that travels from the inside of an object, to the outside. As an object is rotated, gravitational forces at the meeting point, or core, become slightly deflected in angular degree. As an object is more intently rotated, the greater the deflection becomes at the core. At the same time, the reach of gravity beyond the surface of the object, shortens. As the object becomes rotated with ever-greater intensity, the gravitational force reverses 180 degrees, and flows in the opposite direction. Once the reach of gravity does not exceed the surface value of the object, and when the internal flow of gravity exceeds the surface value of the object, things located on the surface begin to fly off and minimal centrifugal force is accomplished.
In a maximum rotation of the object, gravitational forces continually flow from the inside to the outside. Much like the problem that exists from continuously filling a tire with air, nothing can continuously pour out from an object without end. Yet, a spinning object will continuously pour out a reverse gravitational field as it continuously rotates. The continuous rotation is not necessarily the source by which gravity is continuously emitted. The flow dynamic of centrifugal force suggests a looping effect by which two vortex fields form above and below the object rotated. These vortexes loop the emitted gravitational field back into the core of the object.
When an object, such as a top, spins, it throws a gravitational field outward in all directions. Because of this balance of equal forces, the top spins and remains confined to the space it spins in. This would be much like two jet engines facing each other at full blast. However, if we were to remove one jet engines away from the other the static results of these forces would dramatically change.
If only a portion of the gravitational field of the spinning top were weakened or changed, it is believed that the static results would dramatically change because the radiated force would no longer bear equal value.
Only a specific object is in direct control of it’s gravitational force. A separate object of matter, cannot of itself control the gravitational force of the other. Each object does well to control it’s own gravitational field. This is so in a natural or controlled state of the object. However, two gravitational forces can have influence, one to the other. Because of this, specific matter and it’s action can be manipulated. Neither the moon or the earth have effect to each other without the medium of interacting gravitational forces - as it is not the masses of matter in and of themselves which influence each other but by their fields of gravity.
Antigravity propulsion may very well be achieved through centrifugal force by the compliment of two rotating objects. If not, the principal of how the gravitational fields should interact is key to antigravity propulsion.
As an object, such as a sphere, rotates at high speeds, a full compliment of gravitational forces bloom. Here, the object spins on a horizontal plane. The gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. Above and below, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the sphere.
Here, a disk also spins on a horizontal plane. The same gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. As with the sphere, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the disc.
As mentioned before, two gravities may interact and influence each other. Being the case, it is highly possible to designate portions of one gravity field in turn that it may influence another gravity field to accomplish a specific result. The result desired in this case would be to weaken a portion of the gravitational field emitted from the sphere. The remaining gravitational field that is emitted would respectively be the thrust portion of the gravity field.
This is accomplished by turning the disc 90 degrees thereby introducing the disc’s vortex into the sphere’s horizontal radiance. The final result would be the vortex of disc swallowing up a portion of the gravity field emitted by the sphere. Furthermore, the sphere’s gravity would follow the same current path as the disc’s vortex to the disc’s core, Further yet, it is radiated out and away from the disc’s edge at 90 degrees.
The disc’s remaining vortex becomes the leading edge. Because it is a vortex, it too has vacuum-like qualities which may possess the ability to bend the fabric of space, itself.
The combining of these structures adds up to an engine not very much unlike a jet engine.
These simple concepts in proper sequence could very well provide the necessary means for travel in quantum space.
The future is now.
. . . edited this post 1 year ago. Read the previous text »
Real Antigravity?
THE THEORY
OF
ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION
BY
Big Al One
COPYRIGHT 2012
Before we can discuss the subject of antigravity propulsion, we must briefly look back at ourselves, our ancestry, our history and ultimately at the awe and wonder of space. Not just space but those mysteries and things contained within it. The sun, moon and stars, the galaxies and nebulas, the constellations - all things contained therein the embodiment of space. It has been a part of our past. It is certainly here, today in the present and it is not likely to disappear anytime in the near or far future to come. Space has played a major role in religions, in politics, in science and in a commercial market.
The trouble with the things we have discovered in space is not the things themselves. A planet or great nebula that does not have the means to support life, as we understand, should not hinder us to appreciate it as the artisan appreciates art. The actual problem, when we view these glittery diamonds of the night, is the vast distance of space between what we see and us.
What we will not delve into here are petty facts, such as light-years and the speed of light and theories that state that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The mere idea that variances of speed can be idealized anywhere from zero to infinite, reopens a door that is impossible to shut in the first place.
We know what the speed of light is because we can obviously see it. What is faster than light could very well be those things that we cannot see because they travel faster than light itself, already. Therefore, we do not necessarily know of its existence until we can see it, at the speed of light.
If we are to travel to one of those distance points in the universe within reasonable measure of time, we will have to travel at speeds far in excess of the speed of light.
The focus of the subject will be gravity as the likely force of faster than light travel. The mass quantity of gravity in space, known as a black hole, has the ability to bend light from its linear trajectory in the vacuum of space. Even though common science has deemed gravity the weakest of all known forces, the fact remains that it discourses light and therefore is strong by that fact.
What is gravity? This has always been a fundamental question of science. As such, science has measured and theorized all possible avenues it is aware of. Yet, as of today, scientists still do not understand how that gravity, so uniquely different from matter is found only in matter itself where all other forms of energy are found separately from matter. If we are to break the barriers to new understandings, where the things we attempt are genuinely new, we will have to start looking at avenues that are not common but are commonly looked away.
To embrace the technology and forsake the foundation of its principals would be very much like cavemen driving in modern day cars. This is known as a backward principal and directly demeans our current civilization.
All of known life must feed in order to exist. To eat, in order to be resolute. This principal applies from the most complex creatures, such as mammals to the smallest cells. As we study less complex creatures, we quickly understand that feeding and digestive processes become more simplified. In many cases changes in the way a cell would gain nutrition (as through the process of osmosis) is profoundly different than from more complex creatures as these process of simple creatures are increasingly simplified. The principal system becomes simplified as well.
All existing matter exists at a standard, universal rate, called “rate of existence.” When the rate of existence of matter is established, it is established into the field of space. Once established, matter must consume that given area of space, at the rate of existence, per second-per second. This understanding conforms to the laws of consumption.
Once an organism has fed, by-product is a result. Wherein said by-product of the organism must be removed, its digestive system provides the method in which that will occur.
Equally, the result of matter consuming space, results in the by-product of gravity, which is in direct accompaniment of matter producing it. The effect of gravity upon matter results in decay and existence of other interchanging energies. This conforms to the laws of entropy and a universe in decay.
It is clearly understood why gravity cannot be found apart, separately, than that from matter.
Gravity has a reach that extends beyond the object of matter. Practical observation of gravity suggests that it draws other objects (which too have gravity), to the greater mass.
An object falls to the ground. If it were not for the very surface of matter, the object would have fallen further. It becomes clear that the flow of gravity moves from the outside to the very core of the matter. It simply does not stop at the object’s surface.
Gravity continually flows from the outside of an object to the internal core of an object. If air, as an example, were continuously pumped into a tire with no system of release, it would blow up. The laws of interchanging energies prevent a continual build up of gravitational forces in objects of greater size and density. As gravity travels deeper toward the core of the object, great pressures are achieved causing thermodynamic radiation, or heat. The character of thermodynamic radiation moves contrary to the flow of gravitational forces, thus providing a relief of pressure from gravity.
An individual object, which rests on the surface of a greater object, has lost its individual gravitational field to a greater collective. If the individual gravity found within the smaller object were to retain its identity, it would act separately from the greater mass.
Because the nature of gravity draws from the outside to the inside, it would be ideal to harness a gravitational force that travels from the inside to the outside. With the supposition of antimatter (the direct opposite of matter), antimatter would contain a gravitational field which does just this, travel from the inside to the outside, hence antigravity. This is ideal because it provides a basis for propulsion.
Because of the fact, it is not readily practical to harness great quantities antimatter, alternate and reasonable substitutes must be looked at. Even if we were to succeed in harnessing great amounts of antimatter for it‘s antigravity, basic challenges would exist no differently than with the necessary substitute that can be acquired.
Centrifugal Force is a force of gravity that travels from the inside of an object, to the outside. As an object is rotated, gravitational forces at the meeting point, or core, become slightly deflected in angular degree. As an object is more intently rotated, the greater the deflection becomes at the core. At the same time, the reach of gravity beyond the surface of the object, shortens. As the object becomes rotated with ever-greater intensity, the gravitational force reverses 180 degrees, and flows in the opposite direction. Once the reach of gravity does not exceed the surface value of the object, and when the internal flow of gravity exceeds the surface value of the object, things located on the surface begin to fly off and minimal centrifugal force is accomplished.
In a maximum rotation of the object, gravitational forces continually flow from the inside to the outside. Much like the problem that exists from continuously filling a tire with air, nothing can continuously pour out from an object without end. Yet, a spinning object will continuously pour out a reverse gravitational field as it continuously rotates. The continuous rotation is not necessarily the source by which gravity is continuously emitted. The flow dynamic of centrifugal force suggests a looping effect by which two vortex fields form above and below the object rotated. These vortexes loop the emitted gravitational field back into the core of the object.
When an object, such as a top, spins, it throws a gravitational field outward in all directions. Because of this balance of equal forces, the top spins and remains confined to the space it spins in. This would be much like two jet engines facing each other at full blast. However, if we were to remove one jet engines away from the other the static results of these forces would dramatically change.
If only a portion of the gravitational field of the spinning top were weakened or changed, it is believed that the static results would dramatically change because the radiated force would no longer bear equal value.
Only a specific object is in direct control of it’s gravitational force. A separate object of matter, cannot of itself control the gravitational force of the other. Each object does well to control it’s own gravitational field. This is so in a natural or controlled state of the object. However, two gravitational forces can have influence, one to the other. Because of this, specific matter and it’s action can be manipulated. Neither the moon or the earth have effect to each other without the medium of interacting gravitational forces - as it is not the masses of matter in and of themselves which influence each other but by their fields of gravity.
Antigravity propulsion may very well be achieved through centrifugal force by the compliment of two rotating objects. If not, the principal of how the gravitational fields should interact is key to antigravity propulsion.
As an object, such as a sphere, rotates at high speeds, a full compliment of gravitational forces bloom. Here, the object spins on a horizontal plane. The gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. Above and below, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the sphere.
Here, a disk also spins on a horizontal plane. The same gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. As with the sphere, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the disc.
As mentioned before, two gravities may interact and influence each other. Being the case, it is highly possible to designate portions of one gravity field in turn that it may influence another gravity field to accomplish a specific result. The result desired in this case would be to weaken a portion of the gravitational field emitted from the sphere. The remaining gravitational field that is emitted would respectively be the thrust portion of the gravity field.
This is accomplished by turning the disc 90 degrees thereby introducing the disc’s vortex into the sphere’s horizontal radiance. The final result would be the vortex of disc swallowing up a portion of the gravity field emitted by the sphere. Furthermore, the sphere’s gravity would follow the same current path as the disc’s vortex to the disc’s core, Further yet, it is radiated out and away from the disc’s edge at 90 degrees.
The disc’s remaining vortex becomes the leading edge. Because it is a vortex, it too has vacuum-like qualities which may possess the ability to bend the fabric of space, itself.
The combining of these structures adds up to an engine not very much unlike a jet engine.
These simple concepts in proper sequence could very well provide the necessary means for travel in quantum space.
The future is now.
So Al sounds like you are smarter than You think.. keep up the investigation.
It is very interesting, where did A.E. stop, he was pondering ..
“The intellect seeking after an integrated theory cannot rest content with the assumption that there exist two distinct fields totally independent of each other by their nature”..carry on there seems to be a little more to this than meet the eye.
I like what u had to say, im working on designs for a device that uses similar principals. i have several designs but you inspired another.
it has also been proven possible to use centrifugal force for propulsion.
Please excuse my ignorance, but Ive only recently started to try to look deeply at things like this. But Is there a graphic which shows gravity’s effect on a surface object — which shows force lines going some other direction than right towards the center of the mass? — I mean, if a man is standing on the surface of the earth, he feels gravitational force which comes from the mass on “his side of center” but also mass on the “far side of center” — even to the exact opposite point of the planet. — or no?
Post a reply
g wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance, but Ive only recently started to try to look deeply at things like this. But Is there a graphic which shows gravity’s effect on a surface object — which shows force lines going some other direction than right towards the center of the mass? — I mean, if a man is standing on the surface of the earth, he feels gravitational force which comes from the mass on “his side of center” but also mass on the “far side of center” — even to the exact opposite point of the planet. — or no?
Thanks for comming to my post G. No one has visited this one in a long time.
I’ll do my best to answer your questions.
Let me start by saying that you have to sometimes use your imagination. A good imagination is a tool for either fantasy or reality. In this case we want to use it to understand hard-to-detect portions of reality (in this case the flow dynamics of gravity). Over-all the lines of gravitational force really do not go anywhere other then to the center. This is not to say that there isn’t a “splashing” effect with regard of mass-resistance. Just imagine how water acts when it is falling through the air. Water is fluid and conforms to certian shapes of containers. In this case, falling water conforms to the shape and container of gravity. So, therefore, it gives visibility to gravity up to a certain extent..
When you see a drop of water impact onto the surface of the main body, it splashes outward in all directions. Gravity does the same, but it is softer and the overall effect isn’t as violent. But, gravity will settle and soak into mass. Once mass has met saturation, the only thing gravity can do is move towrd the center of the object, from then on. . .
(More below)
g wrote:
I mean, if a man is standing on the surface of the earth, he feels gravitational force which comes from the mass on “his side of center”
Yes.
g wrote:
- but also mass on the “far side of center” — even to the exact opposite point of the planet. — or no?
No. The feeling of gravitational effect is only one sided and location specific.
Think of it this way: Let’s say you’re standing on the surface of a giant apple that has reasonable gravity holding you to it. It it were cut precisly in half and one half removed, you would feel gravity shifting as it seeks equilibrium to the reduction of mass. Obviously less mass entails less gravitational strength holding you to the surface, but once stable, the standard operation in which gravity performs remains the same.
Gravity works and feels like a stream. Imagine you are standing in the middle of a stream. When you face up stream, you can feel water pushing you. As you lift your face to the sky, you can feel gravity pushing it. If you turn in the opposite direction in the stream, you can feel the water pulling on you. As you look face-down to the ground, you can feel gravity pulling your face. Esentially, gravity has a push-pull effect. Further yet, when you are in the stream, water must divide around you because you are a resistor. Excess gravity does divide around you. And once that divided water reaches 51% around you, it begins to remerge back into itself.
Issac Newton did not take this into account. There are four sequences that must properly combine in order to facillitate motion. If any one of these physical properties are omitted, motion does not happen.
Here is the sequence.
1. Push. (or compress)
2. Divide.
3. Remerge.
4. Pull. (or vacuum)
I hope this answer some of your questions.
Thanl you for visiting.
. . . edited this post 4 months, 3 weeks ago. Read the previous text »
Real Antigravity?
THE THEORY
OF
ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION
BY
Big Al One
COPYRIGHT 2012
Before we can discuss the subject of antigravity propulsion, we must briefly look back at ourselves, our ancestry, our history and ultimately at the awe and wonder of space. Not just space but those mysteries and things contained within it. The sun, moon and stars, the galaxies and nebulas, the constellations - all things contained therein the embodiment of space. It has been a part of our past. It is certainly here, today in the present and it is not likely to disappear anytime in the near or far future to come. Space has played a major role in religions, in politics, in science and in a commercial market.
The trouble with the things we have discovered in space is not the things themselves. A planet or great nebula that does not have the means to support life, as we understand, should not hinder us to appreciate it as the artisan appreciates art. The actual problem, when we view these glittery diamonds of the night, is the vast distance of space between what we see and us.
What we will not delve into here are petty facts, such as light-years and the speed of light and theories that state that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The mere idea that variances of speed can be idealized anywhere from zero to infinite, reopens a door that is impossible to shut in the first place.
We know what the speed of light is because we can obviously see it. What is faster than light could very well be those things that we cannot see because they travel faster than light itself, already. Therefore, we do not necessarily know of its existence until we can see it, at the speed of light.
If we are to travel to one of those distance points in the universe within reasonable measure of time, we will have to travel at speeds far in excess of the speed of light.
The focus of the subject will be gravity as the likely force of faster than light travel. The mass quantity of gravity in space, known as a black hole, has the ability to bend light from its linear trajectory in the vacuum of space. Even though common science has deemed gravity the weakest of all known forces, the fact remains that it discourses light and therefore is strong by that fact.
What is gravity? This has always been a fundamental question of science. As such, science has measured and theorized all possible avenues it is aware of. Yet, as of today, scientists still do not understand how that gravity, so uniquely different from matter is found only in matter itself where all other forms of energy are found separately from matter. If we are to break the barriers to new understandings, where the things we attempt are genuinely new, we will have to start looking at avenues that are not common but are commonly looked away.
To embrace the technology and forsake the foundation of its principals would be very much like cavemen driving in modern day cars. This is known as a backward principal and directly demeans our current civilization.
All of known life must feed in order to exist. To eat, in order to be resolute. This principal applies from the most complex creatures, such as mammals to the smallest cells. As we study less complex creatures, we quickly understand that feeding and digestive processes become more simplified. In many cases changes in the way a cell would gain nutrition (as through the process of osmosis) is profoundly different than from more complex creatures as these process of simple creatures are increasingly simplified. The principal system becomes simplified as well.
All existing matter exists at a standard, universal rate, called “rate of existence.” When the rate of existence of matter is established, it is established into the field of space. Once established, matter must consume that given area of space, at the rate of existence, per second-per second. This understanding conforms to the laws of consumption.
Once an organism has fed, by-product is a result. Wherein said by-product of the organism must be removed, its digestive system provides the method in which that will occur.
Equally, the result of matter consuming space, results in the by-product of gravity, which is in direct accompaniment of matter producing it. The effect of gravity upon matter results in decay and existence of other interchanging energies. This conforms to the laws of entropy and a universe in decay.
It is clearly understood why gravity cannot be found apart, separately, than that from matter.
Gravity has a reach that extends beyond the object of matter. Practical observation of gravity suggests that it draws other objects (which too have gravity), to the greater mass.
An object falls to the ground. If it were not for the very surface of matter, the object would have fallen further. It becomes clear that the flow of gravity moves from the outside to the very core of the matter. It simply does not stop at the object’s surface.
Gravity continually flows from the outside of an object to the internal core of an object. If air, as an example, were continuously pumped into a tire with no system of release, it would blow up. The laws of interchanging energies prevent a continual build up of gravitational forces in objects of greater size and density. As gravity travels deeper toward the core of the object, great pressures are achieved causing thermodynamic radiation, or heat. The character of thermodynamic radiation moves contrary to the flow of gravitational forces, thus providing a relief of pressure from gravity.
An individual object, which rests on the surface of a greater object, has lost its individual gravitational field to a greater collective. If the individual gravity found within the smaller object were to retain its identity, it would act separately from the greater mass.
Because the nature of gravity draws from the outside to the inside, it would be ideal to harness a gravitational force that travels from the inside to the outside. With the supposition of antimatter (the direct opposite of matter), antimatter would contain a gravitational field which does just this, travel from the inside to the outside, hence antigravity. This is ideal because it provides a basis for propulsion.
Because of the fact, it is not readily practical to harness great quantities antimatter, alternate and reasonable substitutes must be looked at. Even if we were to succeed in harnessing great amounts of antimatter for it‘s antigravity, basic challenges would exist no differently than with the necessary substitute that can be acquired.
Centrifugal Force is a force of gravity that travels from the inside of an object, to the outside. As an object is rotated, gravitational forces at the meeting point, or core, become slightly deflected in angular degree. As an object is more intently rotated, the greater the deflection becomes at the core. At the same time, the reach of gravity beyond the surface of the object, shortens. As the object becomes rotated with ever-greater intensity, the gravitational force reverses 180 degrees, and flows in the opposite direction. Once the reach of gravity does not exceed the surface value of the object, and when the internal flow of gravity exceeds the surface value of the object, things located on the surface begin to fly off and minimal centrifugal force is accomplished.
In a maximum rotation of the object, gravitational forces continually flow from the inside to the outside. Much like the problem that exists from continuously filling a tire with air, nothing can continuously pour out from an object without end. Yet, a spinning object will continuously pour out a reverse gravitational field as it continuously rotates. The continuous rotation is not necessarily the source by which gravity is continuously emitted. The flow dynamic of centrifugal force suggests a looping effect by which two vortex fields form above and below the object rotated. These vortexes loop the emitted gravitational field back into the core of the object.
When an object, such as a top, spins, it throws a gravitational field outward in all directions. Because of this balance of equal forces, the top spins and remains confined to the space it spins in. This would be much like two jet engines facing each other at full blast. However, if we were to remove one jet engines away from the other the static results of these forces would dramatically change.
If only a portion of the gravitational field of the spinning top were weakened or changed, it is believed that the static results would dramatically change because the radiated force would no longer bear equal value.
Only a specific object is in direct control of it’s gravitational force. A separate object of matter, cannot of itself control the gravitational force of the other. Each object does well to control it’s own gravitational field. This is so in a natural or controlled state of the object. However, two gravitational forces can have influence, one to the other. Because of this, specific matter and it’s action can be manipulated. Neither the moon or the earth have effect to each other without the medium of interacting gravitational forces - as it is not the masses of matter in and of themselves which influence each other but by their fields of gravity.
Antigravity propulsion may very well be achieved through centrifugal force by the compliment of two rotating objects. If not, the principal of how the gravitational fields should interact is key to antigravity propulsion.
As an object, such as a sphere, rotates at high speeds, a full compliment of gravitational forces bloom. Here, the object spins on a horizontal plane. The gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. Above and below, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the sphere.
Here, a disk also spins on a horizontal plane. The same gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. As with the sphere, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the disc.
As mentioned before, two gravities may interact and influence each other. Being the case, it is highly possible to designate portions of one gravity field in turn that it may influence another gravity field to accomplish a specific result. The result desired in this case would be to weaken a portion of the gravitational field emitted from the sphere. The remaining gravitational field that is emitted would respectively be the thrust portion of the gravity field.
This is accomplished by turning the disc 90 degrees thereby introducing the disc’s vortex into the sphere’s horizontal radiance. The final result would be the vortex of disc swallowing up a portion of the gravity field emitted by the sphere. Furthermore, the sphere’s gravity would follow the same current path as the disc’s vortex to the disc’s core, Further yet, it is radiated out and away from the disc’s edge at 90 degrees.
The disc’s remaining vortex becomes the leading edge. Because it is a vortex, it too has vacuum-like qualities which may possess the ability to bend the fabric of space, itself.
The combining of these structures adds up to an engine not very much unlike a jet engine.
These simple concepts in proper sequence could very well provide the necessary means for travel in quantum space.
The future is now.
. . . edited this post 4 months, 3 weeks ago. Read the previous text »
THE THEORY
OF
ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION
BY
Big Al One
COPYRIGHT 2012
Before we can discuss the subject of antigravity propulsion, we must briefly look back at ourselves, our ancestry, our history and ultimately at the awe and wonder of space. Not just space but those mysteries and things contained within it. The sun, moon and stars, the galaxies and nebulas, the constellations - all things contained therein the embodiment of space. It has been a part of our past. It is certainly here, today in the present and it is not likely to disappear anytime in the near or far future to come. Space has played a major role in religions, in politics, in science and in a commercial market.
The trouble with the things we have discovered in space is not the things themselves. A planet or great nebula that does not have the means to support life, as we understand, should not hinder us to appreciate it as the artisan appreciates art. The actual problem, when we view these glittery diamonds of the night, is the vast distance of space between what we see and us.
What we will not delve into here are petty facts, such as light-years and the speed of light and theories that state that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The mere idea that variances of speed can be idealized anywhere from zero to infinite, reopens a door that is impossible to shut in the first place.
We know what the speed of light is because we can obviously see it. What is faster than light could very well be those things that we cannot see because they travel faster than light itself, already. Therefore, we do not necessarily know of its existence until we can see it, at the speed of light.
If we are to travel to one of those distance points in the universe within reasonable measure of time, we will have to travel at speeds far in excess of the speed of light.
The focus of the subject will be gravity as the likely force of faster than light travel. The mass quantity of gravity in space, known as a black hole, has the ability to bend light from its linear trajectory in the vacuum of space. Even though common science has deemed gravity the weakest of all known forces, the fact remains that it discourses light and therefore is strong by that fact.
What is gravity? This has always been a fundamental question of science. As such, science has measured and theorized all possible avenues it is aware of. Yet, as of today, scientists still do not understand how that gravity, so uniquely different from matter is found only in matter itself where all other forms of energy are found separately from matter. If we are to break the barriers to new understandings, where the things we attempt are genuinely new, we will have to start looking at avenues that are not common but are commonly looked away.
To embrace the technology and forsake the foundation of its principals would be very much like cavemen driving in modern day cars. This is known as a backward principal and directly demeans our current civilization.
All of known life must feed in order to exist. To eat, in order to be resolute. This principal applies from the most complex creatures, such as mammals to the smallest cells. As we study less complex creatures, we quickly understand that feeding and digestive processes become more simplified. In many cases changes in the way a cell would gain nutrition (as through the process of osmosis) is profoundly different than from more complex creatures as these process of simple creatures are increasingly simplified. The principal system becomes simplified as well.
All existing matter exists at a standard, universal rate, called “rate of existence.” When the rate of existence of matter is established, it is established into the field of space. Once established, matter must consume that given area of space, at the rate of existence, per second-per second. This understanding conforms to the laws of consumption.
Once an organism has fed, by-product is a result. Wherein said by-product of the organism must be removed, its digestive system provides the method in which that will occur.
Equally, the result of matter consuming space, results in the by-product of gravity, which is in direct accompaniment of matter producing it. The effect of gravity upon matter results in decay and existence of other interchanging energies. This conforms to the laws of entropy and a universe in decay.
It is clearly understood why gravity cannot be found apart, separately, than that from matter.
Gravity has a reach that extends beyond the object of matter. Practical observation of gravity suggests that it draws other objects (which too have gravity), to the greater mass.
An object falls to the ground. If it were not for the very surface of matter, the object would have fallen further. It becomes clear that the flow of gravity moves from the outside to the very core of the matter. It simply does not stop at the object’s surface.
Gravity continually flows from the outside of an object to the internal core of an object. If air, as an example, were continuously pumped into a tire with no system of release, it would blow up. The laws of interchanging energies prevent a continual build up of gravitational forces in objects of greater size and density. As gravity travels deeper toward the core of the object, great pressures are achieved causing thermodynamic radiation, or heat. The character of thermodynamic radiation moves contrary to the flow of gravitational forces, thus providing a relief of pressure from gravity.
An individual object, which rests on the surface of a greater object, has lost its individual gravitational field to a greater collective. If the individual gravity found within the smaller object were to retain its identity, it would act separately from the greater mass.
Because the nature of gravity draws from the outside to the inside, it would be ideal to harness a gravitational force that travels from the inside to the outside. With the supposition of antimatter (the direct opposite of matter), antimatter would contain a gravitational field which does just this, travel from the inside to the outside, hence antigravity. This is ideal because it provides a basis for propulsion.
Because of the fact, it is not readily practical to harness great quantities antimatter, alternate and reasonable substitutes must be looked at. Even if we were to succeed in harnessing great amounts of antimatter for it‘s antigravity, basic challenges would exist no differently than with the necessary substitute that can be acquired.
Centrifugal Force is a force of gravity that travels from the inside of an object, to the outside. As an object is rotated, gravitational forces at the meeting point, or core, become slightly deflected in angular degree. As an object is more intently rotated, the greater the deflection becomes at the core. At the same time, the reach of gravity beyond the surface of the object, shortens. As the object becomes rotated with ever-greater intensity, the gravitational force reverses 180 degrees, and flows in the opposite direction. Once the reach of gravity does not exceed the surface value of the object, and when the internal flow of gravity exceeds the surface value of the object, things located on the surface begin to fly off and minimal centrifugal force is accomplished.
In a maximum rotation of the object, gravitational forces continually flow from the inside to the outside. Much like the problem that exists from continuously filling a tire with air, nothing can continuously pour out from an object without end. Yet, a spinning object will continuously pour out a reverse gravitational field as it continuously rotates. The continuous rotation is not necessarily the source by which gravity is continuously emitted. The flow dynamic of centrifugal force suggests a looping effect by which two vortex fields form above and below the object rotated. These vortexes loop the emitted gravitational field back into the core of the object.
When an object, such as a top, spins, it throws a gravitational field outward in all directions. Because of this balance of equal forces, the top spins and remains confined to the space it spins in. This would be much like two jet engines facing each other at full blast. However, if we were to remove one jet engines away from the other the static results of these forces would dramatically change.
If only a portion of the gravitational field of the spinning top were weakened or changed, it is believed that the static results would dramatically change because the radiated force would no longer bear equal value.
Only a specific object is in direct control of it’s gravitational force. A separate object of matter, cannot of itself control the gravitational force of the other. Each object does well to control it’s own gravitational field. This is so in a natural or controlled state of the object. However, two gravitational forces can have influence, one to the other. Because of this, specific matter and it’s action can be manipulated. Neither the moon or the earth have effect to each other without the medium of interacting gravitational forces - as it is not the masses of matter in and of themselves which influence each other but by their fields of gravity.
Antigravity propulsion may very well be achieved through centrifugal force by the compliment of two rotating objects. If not, the principal of how the gravitational fields should interact is key to antigravity propulsion.
As an object, such as a sphere, rotates at high speeds, a full compliment of gravitational forces bloom. Here, the object spins on a horizontal plane. The gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. Above and below, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the sphere.
Here, a disk also spins on a horizontal plane. The same gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. As with the sphere, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the disc.
As mentioned before, two gravities may interact and influence each other. Being the case, it is highly possible to designate portions of one gravity field in turn that it may influence another gravity field to accomplish a specific result. The result desired in this case would be to weaken a portion of the gravitational field emitted from the sphere. The remaining gravitational field that is emitted would respectively be the thrust portion of the gravity field.
This is accomplished by turning the disc 90 degrees thereby introducing the disc’s vortex into the sphere’s horizontal radiance. The final result would be the vortex of disc swallowing up a portion of the gravity field emitted by the sphere. Furthermore, the sphere’s gravity would follow the same current path as the disc’s vortex to the disc’s core, Further yet, it is radiated out and away from the disc’s edge at 90 degrees.
The disc’s remaining vortex becomes the leading edge. Because it is a vortex, it too has vacuum-like qualities which may possess the ability to bend the fabric of space, itself.
The combining of these structures adds up to an engine not very much unlike a jet engine.
These simple concepts in proper sequence could very well provide the necessary means for travel in quantum space.
The future is now.
Dr. Jekyll wrote:
What did you change?
A slight rearrangement of title and ownership heading.
This post is also my Public Profile, but in Feb, I’m going to change the subject matter from AG to. . .something a little different.
(You should be able to see it right off the bat.)
http://help.com/user/396403-big-al-one
Well then I look forward to reading it and expanding my wisdom once more.
Yeah…
Once again I shirk the beast of burdens I must bear:P
. . . edited this post 4 months, 2 weeks ago. Read the previous text »
THE THEORY OF ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION
BY Big Al One
COPYRIGHT 2012
Before we can discuss the subject of antigravity propulsion, we must briefly look back at ourselves, our ancestry, our history and ultimately at the awe and wonder of space. Not just space but those mysteries and things contained within it. The sun, moon and stars, the galaxies and nebulas, the constellations - all things contained therein the embodiment of space. It has been a part of our past. It is certainly here, today in the present and it is not likely to disappear anytime in the near or far future to come. Space has played a major role in religions, in politics, in science and in a commercial market.
The trouble with the things we have discovered in space is not the things themselves. A planet or great nebula that does not have the means to support life, as we understand, should not hinder us to appreciate it as the artisan appreciates art. The actual problem, when we view these glittery diamonds of the night, is the vast distance of space between what we see and us.
What we will not delve into here are petty facts, such as light-years and the speed of light and theories that state that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The mere idea that variances of speed can be idealized anywhere from zero to infinite, reopens a door that is impossible to shut in the first place.
We know what the speed of light is because we can obviously see it. What is faster than light could very well be those things that we cannot see because they travel faster than light itself, already. Therefore, we do not necessarily know of its existence until we can see it, at the speed of light.
If we are to travel to one of those distance points in the universe within reasonable measure of time, we will have to travel at speeds far in excess of the speed of light.
The focus of the subject will be gravity as the likely force of faster than light travel. The mass quantity of gravity in space, known as a black hole, has the ability to bend light from its linear trajectory in the vacuum of space. Even though common science has deemed gravity the weakest of all known forces, the fact remains that it discourses light and therefore is strong by that fact.
What is gravity? This has always been a fundamental question of science. As such, science has measured and theorized all possible avenues it is aware of. Yet, as of today, scientists still do not understand how that gravity, so uniquely different from matter is found only in matter itself where all other forms of energy are found separately from matter. If we are to break the barriers to new understandings, where the things we attempt are genuinely new, we will have to start looking at avenues that are not common but are commonly looked away.
To embrace the technology and forsake the foundation of its principals would be very much like cavemen driving in modern day cars. This is known as a backward principal and directly demeans our current civilization.
All of known life must feed in order to exist. To eat, in order to be resolute. This principal applies from the most complex creatures, such as mammals to the smallest cells. As we study less complex creatures, we quickly understand that feeding and digestive processes become more simplified. In many cases changes in the way a cell would gain nutrition (as through the process of osmosis) is profoundly different than from more complex creatures as these process of simple creatures are increasingly simplified. The principal system becomes simplified as well.
All existing matter exists at a standard, universal rate, called “rate of existence.” When the rate of existence of matter is established, it is established into the field of space. Once established, matter must consume that given area of space, at the rate of existence, per second-per second. This understanding conforms to the laws of consumption.
Once an organism has fed, by-product is a result. Wherein said by-product of the organism must be removed, its digestive system provides the method in which that will occur.
Equally, the result of matter consuming space, results in the by-product of gravity, which is in direct accompaniment of matter producing it. The effect of gravity upon matter results in decay and existence of other interchanging energies. This conforms to the laws of entropy and a universe in decay.
It is clearly understood why gravity cannot be found apart, separately, than that from matter.
Gravity has a reach that extends beyond the object of matter. Practical observation of gravity suggests that it draws other objects (which too have gravity), to the greater mass.
An object falls to the ground. If it were not for the very surface of matter, the object would have fallen further. It becomes clear that the flow of gravity moves from the outside to the very core of the matter. It simply does not stop at the object’s surface.
Gravity continually flows from the outside of an object to the internal core of an object. If air, as an example, were continuously pumped into a tire with no system of release, it would blow up. The laws of interchanging energies prevent a continual build up of gravitational forces in objects of greater size and density. As gravity travels deeper toward the core of the object, great pressures are achieved causing thermodynamic radiation, or heat. The character of thermodynamic radiation moves contrary to the flow of gravitational forces, thus providing a relief of pressure from gravity.
An individual object, which rests on the surface of a greater object, has lost its individual gravitational field to a greater collective. If the individual gravity found within the smaller object were to retain its identity, it would act separately from the greater mass.
Because the nature of gravity draws from the outside to the inside, it would be ideal to harness a gravitational force that travels from the inside to the outside. With the supposition of antimatter (the direct opposite of matter), antimatter would contain a gravitational field which does just this, travel from the inside to the outside, hence antigravity. This is ideal because it provides a basis for propulsion.
Because of the fact, it is not readily practical to harness great quantities antimatter, alternate and reasonable substitutes must be looked at. Even if we were to succeed in harnessing great amounts of antimatter for it‘s antigravity, basic challenges would exist no differently than with the necessary substitute that can be acquired.
Centrifugal Force is a force of gravity that travels from the inside of an object, to the outside. As an object is rotated, gravitational forces at the meeting point, or core, become slightly deflected in angular degree. As an object is more intently rotated, the greater the deflection becomes at the core. At the same time, the reach of gravity beyond the surface of the object, shortens. As the object becomes rotated with ever-greater intensity, the gravitational force reverses 180 degrees, and flows in the opposite direction. Once the reach of gravity does not exceed the surface value of the object, and when the internal flow of gravity exceeds the surface value of the object, things located on the surface begin to fly off and minimal centrifugal force is accomplished.
In a maximum rotation of the object, gravitational forces continually flow from the inside to the outside. Much like the problem that exists from continuously filling a tire with air, nothing can continuously pour out from an object without end. Yet, a spinning object will continuously pour out a reverse gravitational field as it continuously rotates. The continuous rotation is not necessarily the source by which gravity is continuously emitted. The flow dynamic of centrifugal force suggests a looping effect by which two vortex fields form above and below the object rotated. These vortexes loop the emitted gravitational field back into the core of the object.
When an object, such as a top, spins, it throws a gravitational field outward in all directions. Because of this balance of equal forces, the top spins and remains confined to the space it spins in. This would be much like two jet engines facing each other at full blast. However, if we were to remove one jet engines away from the other the static results of these forces would dramatically change.
If only a portion of the gravitational field of the spinning top were weakened or changed, it is believed that the static results would dramatically change because the radiated force would no longer bear equal value.
Only a specific object is in direct control of it’s gravitational force. A separate object of matter, cannot of itself control the gravitational force of the other. Each object does well to control it’s own gravitational field. This is so in a natural or controlled state of the object. However, two gravitational forces can have influence, one to the other. Because of this, specific matter and it’s action can be manipulated. Neither the moon or the earth have effect to each other without the medium of interacting gravitational forces - as it is not the masses of matter in and of themselves which influence each other but by their fields of gravity.
Antigravity propulsion may very well be achieved through centrifugal force by the compliment of two rotating objects. If not, the principal of how the gravitational fields should interact is key to antigravity propulsion.
As an object, such as a sphere, rotates at high speeds, a full compliment of gravitational forces bloom. Here, the object spins on a horizontal plane. The gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. Above and below, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the sphere.
Here, a disk also spins on a horizontal plane. The same gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. As with the sphere, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the disc.
As mentioned before, two gravities may interact and influence each other. Being the case, it is highly possible to designate portions of one gravity field in turn that it may influence another gravity field to accomplish a specific result. The result desired in this case would be to weaken a portion of the gravitational field emitted from the sphere. The remaining gravitational field that is emitted would respectively be the thrust portion of the gravity field.
This is accomplished by turning the disc 90 degrees thereby introducing the disc’s vortex into the sphere’s horizontal radiance. The final result would be the vortex of disc swallowing up a portion of the gravity field emitted by the sphere. Furthermore, the sphere’s gravity would follow the same current path as the disc’s vortex to the disc’s core, Further yet, it is radiated out and away from the disc’s edge at 90 degrees.
The disc’s remaining vortex becomes the leading edge. Because it is a vortex, it too has vacuum-like qualities which may possess the ability to bend the fabric of space, itself.
The combining of these structures adds up to an engine not very much unlike a jet engine.
These simple concepts in proper sequence could very well provide the necessary means for travel in quantum space.
The future is now.
Hmmm, This is really interesting. It makes sense on an emotional matter as well. I’ve noticed how we say that people have “bad energy” or we call them “energy vampires.” It would seem that they are doing something that creates a gravitational field. Their emotions or way of thinking, which is actual energy being emitted. They might be creating this gravitation field and this is what people refer to when they speak of feeling drained, when around such a person.
You mentioned “An individual object, which rests on the surface of a greater object, has lost its individual gravitational field to a greater collective.”
That would makes sense. Now I think I know how I could create emotional antimatter from what you said,
“If the individual gravity found within the smaller object were to retain its identity, it would act separately from the greater mass.”
It is the whole give and love to those who spite you thing. For If I try to take, I must take more than the person taking for my mass to create enough gravity to then absorb them. Or I could create antimatter, i.e. I could give so that I create something that propels me from the emotional vacuum.
Also it now makes more sense why everyone is so valuable and amazing yet it doesn’t always seem that way and the whole “if you take you lose, if you give you win.” paraphrased of course.
For if you give you are like the sun, shining and feeding many. If you take you are more like a black hole. There comes a point where you must turn your heart and take so much that you become increasingly dark, also, those who “give” are immune to the black hole effect since they are in antimatter and thus create a propulsion that allows them to walk freely among you with not fear of the effects.
You cannot take anything that is of value, for anything you take is self serving. Anything that is love/giving is immune to such actions by the very nature of how they exist.
Okay there’s more but my brain is going to take this in, make some neural connections and then I will be back to make some more connections from that foundation. Rinse and repeat.
I hope it is okay that i am using my language to understand yours. If you understand anything, you understand everything, and any theory that holds up, clears up everything for all things exist on every plain of existence and are effected by every effect. It’s a tapestry of cohesive connection to all. ooooo, okay, i’m not the science talker to explain that in scientific terms but tell me if you understood it. I’m sure you did.
You have more of these posts? I’m going to check over your post history. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. This has helped me more than you could ever know. I can now find a peace from those who would become my enemies. Thank you! I can be free of the hatred and ill that people want to direct towards me. I can shine and know that I am of value and I do have amazing qualities, I understand more now why this is true and yet I don’t always see it. I understand more the words of Christ.
Thank you!
Hey Liarm, I like your perspective.
You might want to visit my Profile page. Soon, I will be
discussing other matters within the field of physics.
Hope to inspire you.
Thanks.
BA1
You do an excellent job of explaining this clearly with minimal knowledge of the science behind it. I assume you’ve been working on turning the theory into some sort of engine design (if you have for goodness sake don’t post the design). Have you done the math behind it and does the math agree with the principles? I think you should write to a university and have it reviewed, but I’d come up with a design first and patent it for obvious reasons.
The thing about how this sort of thing works is, you can’t really protect the theory (you can earn credit but anyone can use an idea); but you can protect a design. I don’t know how far along you are in the development of this idea but I can explain the legal hoops you have to jump through to go from an idea to convincing investors. Basically you have to apply the theory in theory - you don’t have to actually build a prototype; just demonstrate the idea applied on paper. That then becomes yours. Even then investors will try to screw you every way they can so if you get to that stage, get a good patent lawyer. It’s also not easy to convince them that a theoretical design is worth investing in but that’s another challenge in itself.
On the whole really interesting stuff. I’m not close to qualified to comment on its validity in practice but you certainly make it simple enough to understand. When you’ve got your bases covered and you’re confident in the numbers I really think you should have it reviewed by people that are more qualified.
I actually have a working invention currently undergoing US Patenting, although it is a dental product and not something to this magnitude. Only working designs may be Patented. And yes, long the same line as “you can’t Patent a theory,” you can’t Patent an idea - you can only Patent a make and model.
And, yes, I have submitted this theory to MIT. I’m still waiting to see where that goes.
And, yes, I do need thoughts with regard to investors when it comes to my dental product - that, however is something that must wait. I want my invention fully Patented first. I’m entertaining the thought of opening my own production facility (but it won’t be here in the US).
And, I’m confident about the AG theory. It’s not as if it dosen’t need its corners sharpened, but I’ll leave that to those who have the ability to fall into the swing of this. That’s what it amounts to - a little belief and a willingness to go for it. I would like to create a bare-bones working prototype. It would be an engine slightly different than what is understood.
BUt, who knows. Maybe it was just a good shot in the dark.
My persuits havent ended.
And thank you, Robbin for visiting my post.
If you are aware of anyone that is interested in such matters, please feel free to pass along this information or even provide them this link.
Your view is appreciated.
Kudos.
:D
My pleasure, I enjoyed reading it. Besides, if I can say I used to argue with the guy who cracked the mystery of faster than light travel; I reckon I could milk that anecdote for a good 10 years. I’d also see if you could get it published in a scientific journal. As you say, if people in those fields start talking about it and advancing the theory it could very well lead to something.
Good luck with your other designs but I don’t envy your challenge of finding investors. Make sure you make them sign non-disclosure agreements (which they hate doing, but don’t take no for an answer). I know that some governments give non-repayable non-equity research and development grants if you successfully pitch it to them, and they’re less likely to try to screw you. But they usually require a financial commitment to be applicable. They’ve been known to dish out up to £100,000 to independent developers (like the UK’s SMART programme). These are much more common in Europe, particularly in Germany or the UK. I think the French and the Dutch have similar programmes as well anyway it’s an avenue you could explore.
Robben wrote:
My pleasure, I enjoyed reading it. Besides, if I can say I used to argue with the guy who cracked the mystery of faster than light travel; I reckon I could milk that anecdote for a good 10 years.
Well, imputing my recognition upon the matter might keep the cream flowing for 20 years - who knows, lol!
Robben wrote:
I’d also see if you could get it published in a scientific journal. As you say, if people in those fields start talking about it and advancing the theory it could very well lead to something. Make sure you make them sign non-disclosure agreements (which they hate doing, but don’t take no for an answer). I know that some governments give non-repayable non-equity research and development grants if you successfully pitch it to them, and they’re less likely to try to screw you. But they usually require a financial commitment to be applicable. They’ve been known to dish out up to £100,000 to independent developers (like the UK’s SMART programme). These are much more common in Europe, particularly in Germany or the UK. I think the French and the Dutch have similar programmes as well anyway it’s an avenue you could explore.
And that’s the best I can hope for, someone to carry the torch to get the ball rolling. I’m wise to non-disclosure agreements and thank you for re-enforcing that.
As for the rest you may trust that I will bear the other information you provided close to memory as I move forward.
Right now, though, first thing’s first, The “dental product.”
It will happen. And you will see it one day soon.
I’m just too determined.
Science is for bad things why cant we just live simple go camping learn to shoot arrows. build fires and really save the world. not destroy it more. waste of a good mind. seek the truth through god not mans materials. PEACE Thanks! opinion is that everyone has one better not not post this!
adamandchangi wrote:
Science is for bad things why cant we just live simple go camping learn to shoot arrows. build fires and really save the world. not destroy it more. waste of a good mind. seek the truth through god not mans materials. PEACE Thanks! opinion is that everyone has one better not not post this!
Science is for bad things? Thank you for comming by my post unverified user, but I think you have misunderstood the nature of what this post is about. It is about the ability to travel to distant places in Gods Created universe.
If science is bad, so is building fires. And what kind of wars have been fought with arrows - how many people have died with arrows shot through them? See what I mean? And you need to fear not, I do not waste my mind. I believe and read the Bible every day. I believe the truth of God.
Take care now.
:D
I’ve been taking astronomy lately, and I recall when I first started reading your theory that I didn’t completely understand it. It was really alien to me to think about. However since I’ve taken astronomy I now almost completely understand the fundamental function that your talking about here and how theoretically it should work. The one thing in particular that I think of is all the stars when they get to black holes/neutron stars, or really any star that spins with an accretion disk and then shoots material out in a jet from both ends of it’s poles. :)
Dr. Jackson wrote:
I’ve been taking astronomy lately, and I recall when I first started reading your theory that I didn’t completely understand it. It was really alien to me to think about. However since I’ve taken astronomy I now almost completely understand the fundamental function that your talking about here and how theoretically it should work. The one thing in particular that I think of is all the stars when they get to black holes/neutron stars, or really any star that spins with an accretion disk and then shoots material out in a jet from both ends of it’s poles. :)
Well. . .yes. You see, what you’re describing (and I know exactly what you mean) is an abberation of force so completely off the chart, it works backwards from the way I described. It’s winding in on itself so tightly, throwing out so much force from the edge, that, at the core there’s no more room and incredible energy streams are shot out like beams above and below the edge of it’s horizon. As I understand it, that is a phase condition of a star just before it blows sky high. Now, not all stars end the same way, it depends on their composition - matter to gas ratio and how much material cannot be further converted to energy. Some stars are like a back firecracker. A dud, they just fizzle out and nothing remains but the core. Even so, that core (very small) is so compact that it retains most of the gravity it had when it was big. I believe they call that a quazar.
While there are many ideas and theories given to the thought of what (or how) black holes are formed, not all scientists agree on the means that lead up to the final result. I’ve listened and read of countless ideas about this and have come up with a conclusion, myself. (Boy, aren’t I just self-appointed!)
I think of it like canning (or jarring) food. Here, yo have a pot of boiling water or a pressure cooker and cold jars of food with lids on them. You put the cold jars in the cooker and they get hot. After a while of cooking, you bring the jars out to cool. When they’ve cooled by so much, the vaccuum that is occurring inside the jar, draws the lid down tightly and there is a certain and distinct “!ting!” sound. The lid is properly sealed.
As a star burns durring its life, it heats up a vast amount of space - space is cold. The temprature of a true shadow in space cannot be measured with insturmentation. When you hear things like “the temprature of space is over 300 degrees below zero,” it’s based on a relative scale. Believe this when I tell you -it’s a whole different homework assignment.
But, after the the sun/star burns out, there is nothing left of that region of space but shadow. . . As the momentium of heat in that region of space begins to cool, it begins to contract upon itself with expotiential force. It can start drawing in entire solar systems that are near-by, to the center of the former star. This causes an increase of gravity and gravity’s reach. From there, it goes into a perpetual chain reacion of grabbing matter and gaining gravity to a point, it becomes a vortex that can discourse a linear-driven light wave from its intended path.
Thanks for comming by my dying post Doc. It’s good to hear you’re taking astronomy.
Your thinking of a red dwarf, not a quasar. Quasars are about 1 trillion times brighter than our sun and thankfully aren’t located anywhere near us… But any star seems to have the capacity to shoot jets as long as it’s taking in material from the accretion disc around it. (Like I said, I’m in the class right now so I’m pretty confident about the info lol)
Also based off what I’ve been told by my teacher (Who’s been doing it for almost 30 years) has said that if we replaced the sun with a black hole of equal mass, that we wouldn’t fall in, because the gravity would still be the exact same.
Dr. Jackson wrote:
You’re thinking of a red dwarf, not a quasar.
Oh, okay - I’m not beyond correction, sometimes my memory of things will jumble, thanks for the catch.
Dr. Jackson wrote:
But any star seems to have the capacity to shoot jets as long as it’s taking in material from the accretion disc around it. (Like I said, I’m in the class right now so I’m pretty confident about the info lol)
Sure, everything seems to be on point and I agree to the above. Much of the educational curriculum surrounding astronomy really hasn’t change much since the 50’s. It’s statius-quo.
Dr. Jackson wrote:
Also based off what I’ve been told by my teacher (Who’s been doing it for almost 30 years) has said that if we replaced the sun with a black hole of equal mass, that we wouldn’t fall in, because the gravity would still be the exact same.
- Yes, I was taught in 4th grade that a pound of feathers weighs exactly the same as a pound of lead. In the bigger scheme of things, what your teacher is saying is very true. Yes, you are only swapping out the means of what provides the gravitational force Gc2. As long as the gravity is the same, we would remain equidistant. Yet, the size of the black hole could be smaller. Ask him about that for me, see what he thinks.
I don’t think he’d have an answer since we can’t see past the event horizon, so there’d be no real way to measure the size, which is supposedly infinitely small.
This does not coherent?
Tersidy wrote:
This does not coherent?
Please don’t here. If can’t talk, away go. You do not coherent. Bye-bye.
For anyone that has not entirely unsubscribed from this post, I reciently entered a candid debate with regard to the issue at another post. We each held strong views that were both agreeable and disagreeable. As the issue became weeded, I will admit (finally) someone finally presented what I deem acceptable objectionable material. So. . .I certianly have something to think about for a while. Basically, here is what this fellow stated in a condensed forum:
Nolv said: wrote:
- Centrifugal force is only experienced by things which are attached to a spinning object. As soon as they are disconnected and left very close they no longer bear any effects. A bicycle will not become lighter as the wheel(s) spin.
The second thing he followed up with does require a bit of intellictual gymnastics on my part to fully understand, yet at the same time, I do believe he may have misunderstood some of my meaning (which is my fault because I make no claim to be a flawless communicator and oftentimes misunderstanding will result.) Perhaps I should work on this a bit more because I do not want to defeat the purpose of the goal.
Nolv Said wrote:
Also, your flow model shows inconsistency here, initially in the picture you showed, gravity flows towards the masses center from all angles and said: “this consumption of space creates heat as its output of consumption.” Well if your second picture of a spinning mass was correct your flow now goes in at the axis and out at the equator, this would mean in order to conserve “flow” the mass is now no longer using up space as it’s no longer gravity just going in, it is redirected back out and so cannot be producing heat or consuming space as the flow goes in and back out.
——
Now, I honestly do not believe this is what I said (some parts, yes).
What I initially tried to convey, I presented in two parts.
1. That matter consuming space resulted in the by-product of gravity.
I said this as a seperate issue as to explain the instant a gravity comes into existance with matter. The topic of space, itself, was not something I further included in the interaction of mass, gravity and centrifugal force, afterward.
2. It is the compression of matter by gravity which results in heat. ai would like to think that I gave no indication of space contributing to this.
——
Nevertheless, I do have a few things to think about. If anyone would like further add to the cause, both pro or con, I am looking forward to your reply.
Thank you, everybody. :)
I don’t entirely understand it still, but I think I see the point he was talking about.
Dr. Jackson wrote:
I don’t entirely understand it still, but I think I see the point he was talking about.
Lol! Thanks for hanging with me, Doc.
(looks around)
I think the school bell rang out months ago!
Are we the only ones left:P
Interesting post seems pretty knowledgeable and makes sense so far. It’ll take a few days to fully digest it all and give an appropriate response.
iyamah wrote:
Interesting post seems pretty knowledgeable and makes sense so far. It’ll take a few days to fully digest it all and give an appropriate response.
Sure!:D Always glad for different views.
stumbled upon this wikipedia entry today and thought you would find it interesting.
“The Alcubierre drive or Alcubierre metric (See: Metric tensor) is a speculative idea based on a solution of Einstein’s field equations as proposed by Miguel Alcubierre, by which a spacecraft could achieve faster-than-light travel if negative mass existed. Rather than exceeding the speed of light within its local frame of reference, a spacecraft would traverse distances by contracting space in front of it and expanding space behind it, resulting in effective faster-than-light travel.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubier…
see also: http://www.npl.washington.edu/AV/altv…
sounds similar to your idea in many ways. fascinating stuff.
Let the physicists talk - I have no say in this matter. I only hope it would be possible to time travel in the future but the instability of wormholes won’t allow for that. Will it?
laguayarië wrote:
Let the physicists talk - I have no say in this matter. I only hope it would be possible to time travel in the future but the instability of wormholes won’t allow for that. Will it?
I cannot speak so much for the fators of time. I think we would be doing well enough to get around a bit better than we do.
:D
BIG AL ONE wrote:
Tersidy wrote:
This does not coherent?Please don’t here. If can’t talk, away go. You do not coherent. Bye-bye.
Sorry about my earlier post; I should have been more polite, but had other problems.
Very interesting (and thanks for replying to my post by the way, anon one about girls deciding which man they like).
Do you think you could achieve asymmetric gravity and resulting propulsion by changing the shape of an object? All the objects with significant gravity are planet sized and round, I wonder what kind of gravitational forces a half sphere shaped planet would exert, or one shaped like half a tennis ball, that inverts inside itself.
On the more general subject of physics, I am interested in telepathy, because seeing as speech is just the translation of electrical signals from the brain (thoughts) I think it would be possibly to tap into these signals directly.
You said that the scientific community can sometimes intellectualise away theories, well I’m a software engineer so I’m all for testing things out :)
jontigerdo wrote:
Very interesting (and thanks for replying to my post by the way, anon one about girls deciding which man they like).
Ah, yes-yes, I remember. . .
jontigerdo wrote:
Do you think you could achieve asymmetric gravity and resulting propulsion by changing the shape of an object? All the objects with significant gravity are planet sized and round, I wonder what kind of gravitational forces a half sphere shaped planet would exert, or one shaped like half a tennis ball, that inverts inside itself.
Well, (first)if we’re merely talking about the shape of an object as being obscure from anything that is round, gravity will settle to the shapes conceptual center-point. This is where gravity becomes a divisor and would cause perfect balance to an obscure shape of mass. The gravity field, itself would remain spherical and draw the odd-shaped mass into what is spherical. A long, flat rectangle would eventually become round by the work of gravitational force.
Yet, I do think that objects which change shape can momentarily have a reverse imprint to gravity - “square” or “triangle” shaped gravity. But, that would be like dealing with the potential of making a square hole in water by removing water with a square bucket. The hope of it is too fleeting. I couldn’t wrap my mind around it (but I’m also tired ATM).
——————
jontigerdo wrote:
On the more general subject of physics, I am interested in telepathy, because seeing as speech is just the translation of electrical signals from the brain (thoughts) I think it would be possible to tap into these signals directly. You said that the scientific community can sometimes intellectualise away theories, well I’m a software engineer so I’m all for testing things out :)
Yes, I remember saying that. Just to say: telepathy isn’t classified in the realm of physics, (I know, I know, just saying. One of the key words you bring up is “thoughts.” Well. . .where do thoughts reside - of course, in the mind, but WHERE do thoughts reside. I don’t toy much with the principal of telepathy, but I might be able to provide some ground to help your endevor.
(BELOW)
The speed of a car isn’t soley based on the strength or power of it’s engine. Much of the result of speed is determined by it’s transmission. Here, you have made a basic link between common thought and speech. That’s quite elementary, but you’re missing the other half. In order to recognize a thought you must be able to first hear it. . .
A thought can rest right on the rim of being spoken, but it is fully established on the foundation of hearing. I’m not one to speculate on the manifestation or how the thought came to be, I am simply taking the thought precept and using it as it is. You have to hear it. Just as the thought is related to speech, thought is related to the ear - go figure.
Now, I’m not going to change the subject, so listen carefully.
Man uses telepathy every day. He just doesn’t know it, nor does he recognize it because the form of telepathy is so under the radar, he misses it.
Here’s what you obviously know; walk into a crowed of people and yawn. Unlike subliminal suggestion through visualization, a yawn actually physically forces another person to do the same. Don’t believe it? Okay, ready for this? Walk up to a blind man and yawn. . .then go clean the $#!t out of your pants after you see what happens. He has heard you. Telepathy. When it comes to thought transmission, you’re looking down the wrong path if you’re trying to find where the vocal cords hook up.
Hope this helps.
By saying you’re not going to change the subject, do you mean you want to stick to anti-gravity on this thread, not telepathy?
I was thinking more about reading brain waves with EEG, I was considering actually trying to do this since you can buy EEG headsets for £50 or £100. So I would get someone or several people to think something e.g. count from 1 to 10, around one word per second, and then anaylse the brain waves. You can already get a computer mouse to move left or right in response to learnt brain waves for thinking “left” or “right”, so I would just take this further, mapping the alphabet, words etc.
Re gravity propulsion, I see from your explanation that shape will not work. Would it be possible to create an extremely dense object and use its pulling power? Like a black hole.
jontigerdog wrote:
I see from your explanation that shape will not work. Would it be possible to create an extremely dense object and use its pulling power? Like a black hole.
Yes, that’s exactly what my theory is about. A high speed rotating object creates two vortexes - lesser versions of ‘black holes.’ That’s why I believe centrifugal force provides the key element for propulsion.
——————–
jontigerdog wrote:
By saying you’re not going to change the subject, do you mean you want to stick to anti-gravity on this thread, not telepathy?
No, I didn’t mean to give you that impression. I was just providing a different view that may have seemed off the topic of telepathy.
Even though this is an Anti-Gravity thread, I’m happy to talk about other things of interest.
——————–
jontigerdog wrote:
I was thinking more about reading brain waves with EEG, I was considering actually trying to do this since you can buy EEG headsets for £50 or £100. So I would get someone or several people to think something e.g. count from 1 to 10, around one word per second, and then anaylse the brain waves. You can already get a computer mouse to move left or right in response to learnt brain waves for thinking “left” or “right”, so I would just take this further, mapping the alphabet, words etc.
Well, I think before you do this, you may consider the existing research that has already been accomplished. Core study of the issue on a scientific level has been conducted from the 40’s up to the late 70’s. Interest of telepathy has all but fallen away. There’s a lot of information out there about it. Perhaps you could look at that information as your personal building blocks of knowledge.
The real question is: What kind of breakthrough are you wanting to accomplish?
Yes true I could read up on it. I see someone has got a participant to play a computer game with their thoughts, controlling movement and actions. I would have to think about my reasons, I am not really sure. I think it would mean existence on 2 levels of consciousness, what you think and what you say, where thoughts would be more extreme and unfiltered and it was accepted that spoken words show greater intention. So ultimately greater intimacy, if you can take it, and deeper insight into the human psyche, since thoughts currently are only sometimes spoken directly; pre-conceptions, fears and unwillingness to offend etc. prevent true revelation of everyones thoughts. Which could be very different or surprisingly similar.
About centrifugal force - surely a lot of input is required to achieve this, i.e. isn’t it more energy transfer than generation? (I know energy can only be transferred, not created, but hopefully you know what I mean). Also, how can those vortexes be excessively dense, they are just air currents? I was thinking of using huge machines to crush matter into a super-dense blob, which, due to its shape alone, would have a pull. But perhaps it would simply expand and lose this force, hence not a renewable force.
. . . edited this post 1 week ago. Read the previous text »
THE THEORY OF ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION
BY Big Al One
COPYRIGHT 2012, 2013
Before we can discuss the subject of antigravity propulsion, we must briefly look back at ourselves, our ancestry, our history and ultimately at the awe and wonder of space. Not just space but those mysteries and things contained within it. The sun, moon and stars, the galaxies and nebulas, the constellations - all things contained therein the embodiment of space. It has been a part of our past. It is certainly here, today in the present and it is not likely to disappear anytime in the near or far future to come. Space has played a major role in religions, in politics, in science and in a commercial market.
The trouble with the things we have discovered in space is not the things themselves. A planet or great nebula that does not have the means to support life, as we understand, should not hinder us to appreciate it as the artisan appreciates art. The actual problem, when we view these glittery diamonds of the night, is the vast distance of space between what we see and us.
What we will not delve into here are petty facts, such as light-years and the speed of light and theories that state that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. The mere idea that variances of speed can be idealized anywhere from zero to infinite, reopens a door that is impossible to shut in the first place.
We know what the speed of light is because we can obviously see it. What is faster than light could very well be those things that we cannot see because they travel faster than light itself, already. Therefore, we do not necessarily know of its existence until we can see it, at the speed of light.
If we are to travel to one of those distance points in the universe within reasonable measure of time, we will have to travel at speeds far in excess of the speed of light.
The focus of the subject will be gravity as the likely force of faster than light travel. The mass quantity of gravity in space, known as a black hole, has the ability to bend light from its linear trajectory in the vacuum of space. Even though common science has deemed gravity the weakest of all known forces, the fact remains that it discourses light and therefore is strong by that fact.
What is gravity? This has always been a fundamental question of science. As such, science has measured and theorized all possible avenues it is aware of. Yet, as of today, scientists still do not understand how that gravity, so uniquely different from matter is found only in matter itself where all other forms of energy are found separately from matter. If we are to break the barriers to new understandings, where the things we attempt are genuinely new, we will have to start looking at avenues that are not common but are commonly looked away.
To embrace the technology and forsake the foundation of its principals would be very much like cavemen driving in modern day cars. This is known as a backward principal and directly demeans our current civilization.
All of known life must feed in order to exist. To eat, in order to be resolute. This principal applies from the most complex creatures, such as mammals to the smallest cells. As we study less complex creatures, we quickly understand that feeding and digestive processes become more simplified. In many cases changes in the way a cell would gain nutrition (as through the process of osmosis) is profoundly different than from more complex creatures as these process of simple creatures are increasingly simplified. The principal system becomes simplified as well.
All existing matter exists at a standard, universal rate, called “rate of existence.” When the rate of existence of matter is established, it is established into the field of space. Once established, matter must consume that given area of space, at the rate of existence, per second-per second. This understanding conforms to the laws of consumption.
Once an organism has fed, by-product is a result. Wherein said by-product of the organism must be removed, its digestive system provides the method in which that will occur.
Equally, the result of matter consuming space, results in the by-product of gravity, which is in direct accompaniment of matter producing it. The effect of gravity upon matter results in decay and existence of other interchanging energies. This conforms to the laws of entropy and a universe in decay.
It is clearly understood why gravity cannot be found apart, separately, than that from matter.
Gravity has a reach that extends beyond the object of matter. Practical observation of gravity suggests that it draws other objects (which too have gravity), to the greater mass.
An object falls to the ground. If it were not for the very surface of matter, the object would have fallen further. It becomes clear that the flow of gravity moves from the outside to the very core of the matter. It simply does not stop at the object’s surface.
Gravity continually flows from the outside of an object to the internal core of an object. If air, as an example, were continuously pumped into a tire with no system of release, it would blow up. The laws of interchanging energies prevent a continual build up of gravitational forces in objects of greater size and density. As gravity travels deeper toward the core of the object, great pressures are achieved causing thermodynamic radiation, or heat. The character of thermodynamic radiation moves contrary to the flow of gravitational forces, thus providing a relief of pressure from gravity.
An individual object, which rests on the surface of a greater object, has lost its individual gravitational field to a greater collective. If the individual gravity found within the smaller object were to retain its identity, it would act separately from the greater mass.
Because the nature of gravity draws from the outside to the inside, it would be ideal to harness a gravitational force that travels from the inside to the outside. With the supposition of antimatter (the direct opposite of matter), antimatter would contain a gravitational field which does just this, travel from the inside to the outside, hence antigravity. This is ideal because it provides a basis for propulsion.
Because of the fact, it is not readily practical to harness great quantities antimatter, alternate and reasonable substitutes must be looked at. Even if we were to succeed in harnessing great amounts of antimatter for it‘s antigravity, basic challenges would exist no differently than with the necessary substitute that can be acquired.
Centrifugal Force is a force of gravity that travels from the inside of an object, to the outside. As an object is rotated, gravitational forces at the meeting point, or core, become slightly deflected in angular degree. As an object is more intently rotated, the greater the deflection becomes at the core. At the same time, the reach of gravity beyond the surface of the object, shortens. As the object becomes rotated with ever-greater intensity, the gravitational force reverses 180 degrees, and flows in the opposite direction. Once the reach of gravity does not exceed the surface value of the object, and when the internal flow of gravity exceeds the surface value of the object, things located on the surface begin to fly off and minimal centrifugal force is accomplished.
In a maximum rotation of the object, gravitational forces continually flow from the inside to the outside. Much like the problem that exists from continuously filling a tire with air, nothing can continuously pour out from an object without end. Yet, a spinning object will continuously pour out a reverse gravitational field as it continuously rotates. The continuous rotation is not necessarily the source by which gravity is continuously emitted. The flow dynamic of centrifugal force suggests a looping effect by which two vortex fields form above and below the object rotated. These vortexes loop the emitted gravitational field back into the core of the object.
When an object, such as a top, spins, it throws a gravitational field outward in all directions. Because of this balance of equal forces, the top spins and remains confined to the space it spins in. This would be much like two jet engines facing each other at full blast. However, if we were to remove one jet engines away from the other the static results of these forces would dramatically change.
If only a portion of the gravitational field of the spinning top were weakened or changed, it is believed that the static results would dramatically change because the radiated force would no longer bear equal value.
Only a specific object is in direct control of it’s gravitational force. A separate object of matter, cannot of itself control the gravitational force of the other. Each object does well to control it’s own gravitational field. This is so in a natural or controlled state of the object. However, two gravitational forces can have influence, one to the other. Because of this, specific matter and it’s action can be manipulated. Neither the moon or the earth have effect to each other without the medium of interacting gravitational forces - as it is not the masses of matter in and of themselves which influence each other but by their fields of gravity.
Antigravity propulsion may very well be achieved through centrifugal force by the compliment of two rotating objects. If not, the principal of how the gravitational fields should interact is key to antigravity propulsion.
As an object, such as a sphere, rotates at high speeds, a full compliment of gravitational forces bloom. Here, the object spins on a horizontal plane. The gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. Above and below, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the sphere.
Here, a disk also spins on a horizontal plane. The same gravitational forces are thrown out to the left and right. As with the sphere, the two vortexes return the gravity back into the core of the disc.
As mentioned before, two gravities may interact and influence each other. Being the case, it is highly possible to designate portions of one gravity field in turn that it may influence another gravity field to accomplish a specific result. The result desired in this case would be to weaken a portion of the gravitational field emitted from the sphere. The remaining gravitational field that is emitted would respectively be the thrust portion of the gravity field.
This is accomplished by turning the disc 90 degrees thereby introducing the disc’s vortex into the sphere’s horizontal radiance. The final result would be the vortex of disc swallowing up a portion of the gravity field emitted by the sphere. Furthermore, the sphere’s gravity would follow the same current path as the disc’s vortex to the disc’s core, Further yet, it is radiated out and away from the disc’s edge at 90 degrees.
The disc’s remaining vortex becomes the leading edge. Because it is a vortex, it too has vacuum-like qualities which may possess the ability to bend the fabric of space, itself.
The combining of these structures adds up to an engine not very much unlike a jet engine.
These simple concepts in proper sequence could very well provide the necessary means for travel in quantum space.
The future is now.
Invite Others to Help
A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.
