homework help: Philosophy question: How did the Good Samaritan have empathy? - Help.com

hokuikekai70
offline Verified (2 years, 9 months) Visit hokuikekai70's shoutbox
US

Philosophy question: How did the Good Samaritan have empathy?

Were his actions above & beyond the call of duty or was it his moral obligation?

This open post was written 2 years, 8 months ago | V/U/S: 343, 2, 1 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post


Reciprocity (0) Reciprocation Failure -- The poster has NOT helped anyone else yet!

Since writing this post hokuikekai70 may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. hokuikekai70 is a verified member, has been around for 2 years, 9 months and has 13 posts and 13 replies to their name.

Post Tags (11)

Replies (2)

Where were you?

Click and drag to move the map around. FAQ: How we place people on this map »
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
Mouse over the map for 2 seconds to see an expanded, interactive view

Rayduskondynim offline Verified User (2 years, 9 months) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
Horta, 23, PT | 2 years, 6 months ago (1 month, 3 weeks after post)

I think he acted on his moral obligations. The other men who passed by ignored their moral obligations, although I am sure they had them as well.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Warrior Poet offline Verified User (2 years, 3 months) Long Term User Shouts: 3 #
Toronto, ON, CA | 2 years, 3 months ago (4 months, 2 weeks after post)

That’s three questions. ; )

1) How did he have empathy? Empathy is an expression of love, a recognition that we are connected to every other particle of existence (eg. other people). That being a universal principle, the Samaritan already possessed empathy as part of his being.

2) Were his actions above the call of duty? Duty is a relative, not an absolute; so we can say yes or no depending on whom the judgement of duty falls.

3) Was it his moral obligation? Again, morals are highly subjective and are always suspect. Once again, we can say yes or no depending on who’s answering.

..This is why those who passed by did not help - they saw through the eyes of duty or morality, and decided that either it was not their duty, or not their moral obligation.

For the Samaritan, it was neither dutiful or moral to help another being - he simply recognized himself in the other person (empathy), and love did what love always does: gave freely of itself, without attachment.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators

Invite Others to Help

A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.