Eye help: hey… i need essay help. - Help.com

hey…

i need essay help. im writeing an essay on cross-cultural experience and an individuals perspectives. the two essays i read for this was David Abram’s “the ecology of magic” and Oliver Sacks’ “the minds eye”. and my teacher wants me to see if abram’s cross cultural experiences confirm, contradict, and/or complicate sacks’ disscution on the role of an individual’s perspective. idk its just a rough draft for now so any help would be apreciated, and even if u dont know the authors just come with some ideas anyway. im sure i can get through the rough draft for tomarrow, but i could use some more ideas for my final draft. THANKS ALL.

This open post was written 2 years, 2 months ago | V/U/S: 267, 6, 3 | Edit Post | Leave a reply | Report Post


Reciprocity (0) Reciprocation Failure -- The poster has NOT helped anyone else yet!

Since writing this post zimbobwa may have helped people, but has not within the last 4 days. zimbobwa is a verified member, has been around for 2 years, 6 months and has 12 posts and 246 replies to their name.

Post Tags (11)

Replies (6)

Where were you?

Click and drag to move the map around. FAQ: How we place people on this map »
You can also watch events on Help.com as they happen
Mouse over the map for 2 seconds to see an expanded, interactive view

Oster: Gettin' It. offline Verified User (2 years, 7 months) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
Atlanta, GA, US | 2 years, 2 months ago (54 minutes after post)

Is this an essay where you’re observing the observers? As in you’re commenting on Abram and Sacks themselves?

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Oster: Gettin' It. offline Verified User (2 years, 7 months) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
Atlanta, GA, US | 2 years, 2 months ago (2 hours, 1 minute after post)

Possibilities:

The main difference between the pieces is that Abram is talking about his own experience of shifting by learning from another culture, and Sacks is reporting on the experiences of others who are shifting focus because of a primary sense loss. Abram loses his shift shortly after leaving the environment, which implies to me that he adopted the perspective of the culture in which he existed. I have little doubt that going back to the environment, Abram would again shift his perception.

The cases which Sacks reports on are permanent conditions of people who, apparently, do not change cultures, but have no choice except to change focus. How the individuals change focus varies.

The pieces are similar in that language and the cultural perceptions built around language must be overcome to describe the focal shifts and reimagined world. In Abram’s piece, language is a temporary barrier — for example, Abram must reconsider the meaning of “spirit” to understand the cultural perspective. Sacks and his subjects have the change of describing their experiences in terms a general, sighted audience can understand to give us any concept of their inner experience.

I would say there is general affirmation between the two regarding the shifting of focus, but Sacks does not appear to mention anything about how the people he is reporting on changed their understanding of their environment, or their emotional relationship to it, only how they adapted to the loss if sight, while Abram points to the return of thinking-in-words as the dominant shift from culturally influenced perception.

IMHO, Abram is talking more about emotional or unconscious perception after redefining his Western-influenced understanding, and Sacks doesn’t go that far.

Hope that helps.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
zimbobwa offline Verified User (2 years, 6 months) Long Term User Shouts: 9 #
An Unknown Location | 2 years, 2 months ago (5 hours, 45 minutes after post)

So would you go so far to say that abram basically complicates sacks ideas even more?

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Oster: Gettin' It. offline Verified User (2 years, 7 months) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
Atlanta, GA, US | 2 years, 2 months ago (6 hours, 11 minutes after post)

Absolutely.

Sacks’ examples are mostly functional adaptations, similar to controlled experiments where only one factor is changed.

Abram’s experience is affected by culture, language and environment.

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Violation offline Verified User (2 years) Long Term User Shouts: 1 #
Livingston, NJ, US | 2 years ago (1 month, 1 week after post)

no no no i cant cuz theres no hope!!!!!!

Quote this reply Report this reply to moderators
Help me with: I need essay help…..

Invite Others to Help

A logged in and verified Help.com member has the ability to setup a Friends List and invite others to help with posts.