http://help.com/post/47568-my-heart-g…

It’s funny how many times I’ve heard the “I’m going to Seriously consider moving to another country if the candidate I support doesn’t win” cry baby mantra throughout the years. The funniest part is most people never move; they just reiterate the mantra in the next election cycle.

I also find it rather ignorant for people to stereotypically call a whole group of people names simply because they hold a different opinion then you do. I find it to also be quite humorous to hear this from a self proclaimed libertarian; kind of makes me wonder if you know what a libertarian really is.

your welcome to move to Canada we like democrats.

I go off personal experience,stop assumin.

Im not goin off no statistics,unless u wnna look at the crime rate.
Whichin my town has spiked in the past 2 years from mainly the increase in blacks around here.

And i know there are some nicer folks.
But the majority of them around here act all big badd,all the time.
Until they get locked up.

And i get an uncle that is black.Hes one of the nicer ones.
His mom is always sayin **** bout my aunt though.And from them i had 3 black cousins.

So, you’re white, and you want someone who looks like you, no matter what his beliefs or standards, and just as long as he was in vietnam?

[quote Anonymous]Now im not trying to be racist. It’s just that most blacks today already think they are the greatest things in the world and they cause trouble for everyone. i have had a personal experience with this.[/quote]

Hmm, “most blacks” – I’m wondering just how many black people you know personally, and what statistics you might be citing. Do your sources say that 80% of black people are “uppity?” 90 percent? 60 percent? Troublemakers, are they?

Actually, this way of thinking is what most people mean by “racist.”

[quote Anonymous]If Obama wins,then the blacks will think that they rule the country and will have even less care for the laws.[/quote]

I get the feeling that you don’t have much experience in the world, but that you may have been spending a lot of time with Rush Limbaugh … You probably have never actually known an actual black person.

[quote Anonymous]If Mcain wins it will be just bout the same as Bush, and im fine with that. Call it fear or whatever but it’s a fear that i know is common.[/quote]

I would call it racism and ignorance. And maybe some fear too.

the 2 candidates we have now,its a lesser of two evils.
personally,i would go for mcain.not because of his policies or any of that.but because he is white,and a vietnam vet.

Now im not trying to be racist.
Its just that most blacks today already think they are the greatest things in the world and they cause trouble for everyone.i have had a personal experience with this.

If Obama wins,then the blacks will think that they rule the country and will have even less care for the laws.

If Mcain wins it will be just bout the same as bush.and im fine with that.

Call it fear or watever but its a fear that i know is common.

Why haven’t we drilled for oil already?
Why is solar and wind power a requirement for every new home built?
Why doesn’t every American have catastrophic health insurance?
Why is there any unemployment in America?
Why are “illegal” anything allowed?

Why haven’t Obama/McCain already solved these existing problems as the have been part of government.

Who the democrats?[/quote]

Oh yes, of course!![/quote]

I don’t agree, the amount of fraud conducted by both parties in the last two elections is nothing new and was not material.[/quote]

As you like …

Who the democrats?[/quote]

Oh yes, of course!![/quote]

I don’t agree, the amount of fraud conducted by both parties in the last two elections is nothing new and was not material.

Who the democrats?[/quote]

Oh yes, of course!!

Who the democrats?

Clinton became president when I was 18, so my adulthood has been eight years of Clinton and eight years of Bush, and there is no doubt that the Clinton years were far more comfortable, peaceful, and prosperous than the Bush years. Now Obama is not Bill Clinton, but I have not lived in a time when prosperity was under the leadership of a Republican President. Obama in my eyes is better than Clinton, but one thing they have in common is there ability to charm, which is an underrated characteristic, but essential to world peace.

Congress is run by corporations, lobbyists and unions, neither party is better then the other and this problem did not start when Bush took office 7 years ago. A Democratic congress under Obama will change the polices set up by Bush, but they wont fix the corruption, the earmarks, the pork, the unethical behavior. The Democrat run congress wants all of that to continue, and if Obama is not with them (and I hope he is not) he will have a battle on his hands.

Please forgive me, I did not intend this post to be about which side is better, but about the government as a whole. But to help with that point, the same mapping showed that Kerry was to win the presidency in 2004. Both candidates are to close to make such determinations and the point I was making is that the current unrest is not party driven because each party has their bass and it has not left them. The unhappiness is not party driven it has to be the government as a whole that people are disappointed in.[/quote]

Yes, it is a little early to call a winner. I understand you point about the country being unhappy, but the ones who support Obama feel that he is the revolution. The one’s who don’t support him are either firm conservatives or are afraid of something. You even admitted to being somewhat afraid of hime turning out to be not what he promises. He is the best hope for our country. McCain is not a great leader, so what if people have heard his name, he is a consistent flip flopper with a BAD temper. As far as a revolution, the truth is as bad as we think we have it, we still as a whole live a very lavish lifestyle compared to most of the world. We still have enough money to produce significant amount of more garbage than any other nation. Yes, things need to change else we will continue to plumet, but we are far from deprived and needing to overthrow our government. We have the power to overthrow in November, just as we did four years ago when a majority decided it was safer to stick with the status quote. As we all know this was a HUGE mistake!!!!

Please forgive me, I did not intend this post to be about which side is better, but about the government as a whole. But to help with that point, the same mapping showed that Kerry was to win the presidency in 2004. Both candidates are to close to make such determinations and the point I was making is that the current unrest is not party driven because each party has their bass and it has not left them. The unhappiness is not party driven it has to be the government as a whole that people are disappointed in.

Unfortuntly I do not think we are living in a healthy democracy. So while I would prefear a political revolution I dont see it happening. Ross Perot would not have won, thats why he pulled out. and thats why it wont happen.

No that is in correct, all polling places are showing the same information. They are all independent of each other, some are liberal some are conservative and some just do their job. Obama & McCain are statistically tied. This is fact, not “misinformation”

[quote Maximina][quote florie]I don’t believe that Obama & McCain are nearly tied. I think that’s “misinformation.”[/quote]

Obama is up by six point consistenly over the last few weeks, so statistically that is not a tie.[/quote]

Even at 6%, Depending on the samlping rate, the margen of error bring them to a close tie.

No that is in correct, all polling places are showing the same information. They are all independent of each other, some are liberal some are conservative and some just do their job. Obama & McCain are statistically tied. This is fact, not “misinformation”

Obama is up by six point consistenly over the last few weeks, so statistically that is not a tie.