[Help] For the love of God people, no more making posts about the reply situation. Updates to this post /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:09:25 +0100 Reply from perez...cookie... /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4615508 omg that wuz a bad thing to do

]]>
perez...cookie... Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:42:49 +0100
Reply from Commander Ikari /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4599406 [youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnHksDFHTQI]

]]>
Commander Ikari Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:08:10 +0100
Reply from Commander Ikari /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4595297 [quote ►Shizuko-Sophie◄]no just wanted to include something off topic to the post… like the poster did to my post……[/quote]

Oh Sophie, how clever you are!

]]>
Commander Ikari Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:54:21 +0100
Reply from Michael Leibman /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594757 I skimmed your copied words (I’m almost asleep), and my eyes kept going to the bottom of the page, where there is ‘Jenneh Random’. Anyway, have a nice day :)

]]>
Michael Leibman Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:43:48 +0100
Reply from ►Shizuko-Sophie◄ /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594752 no just wanted to include something off topic to the post… like the poster did to my post……

]]>
►Shizuko-Sophie◄ Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:42:32 +0100
Reply from Michael Leibman /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594750 Or did you just randomly happen to leave a reply of randomness. It doesn’t make complete sense to me, is what I’m saying.

]]>
Michael Leibman Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:42:17 +0100
Reply from Michael Leibman /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594740 Still, I’m curious as to whether you would like more information about something from the original post to make it seem less random to you.

]]>
Michael Leibman Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:40:44 +0100
Reply from ►Shizuko-Sophie◄ /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594734 I love chaos theory…

as some one who does a lot of work with fractals I can see how it works very well…

]]>
►Shizuko-Sophie◄ Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:38:54 +0100
Reply from Michael Leibman /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594723 chaos in chaos theory: stuff that doesn’t make sense.

emergent order in complexity theory: stuff that makes sense.

]]>
Michael Leibman Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:36:31 +0100
Reply from Michael Leibman /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594712 Randomness: Stuff that doesn’t make sense to you. Static.

]]>
Michael Leibman Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:33:32 +0100
Reply from ►Shizuko-Sophie◄ /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594690 In the physical sciences

In the 19th century scientists used the idea of random motions of molecules in the development of statistical mechanics in order to explain phenomena in thermodynamics and the properties of gases.

According to several standard interpretations of quantum mechanics, microscopic phenomena are objectively random. That is, in an experiment where all causally relevant parameters are controlled, there will still be some aspects of the outcome which vary randomly. An example of such an experiment is placing a single unstable atom in a controlled environment; it cannot be predicted how long it will take for the atom to decay; only the probability of decay within a given time can be calculated.[3] Thus quantum mechanics does not specify the outcome of individual experiments but only the probabilities. Hidden variable theories are inconsistent with the view that nature contains irreducible randomness: such theories posit that in the processes that appear random, properties with a certain statistical distribution are somehow at work “behind the scenes” determining the outcome in each case.

]]>
►Shizuko-Sophie◄ Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:26:50 +0100
Reply from ►Shizuko-Sophie◄ /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594688 Randomness in science

Many scientific fields are concerned with randomness:

* Algorithmic probability
* Chaos theory
* Cryptography
* Game theory
* Information theory
* Pattern recognition
* Probability theory
* Quantum mechanics
* Statistics
* Statistical mechanics

]]>
►Shizuko-Sophie◄ Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:25:48 +0100
Reply from ►Shizuko-Sophie◄ /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594687 History

Humankind has been concerned with random physical processes since pre-historic times. Examples are divination (cleromancy, reading messages in casting lots), the use of allotment in the Athenian democracy, and the frequent references to the casting of lots found in the Old Testament.

Despite the prevalence of gambling in all times and cultures, for a long time there was little inquiry into the subject. Though Gerolamo Cardano and Galileo wrote about games of chance, the first mathematical treatments were given by Blaise Pascal, Pierre de Fermat and Christiaan Huygens. The classical version of probability theory that they developed proceeds from the assumption that outcomes of random processes are equally likely; thus they were among the first to give a definition of randomness in statistical terms. The concept of statistical randomness was later developed into the concept of information entropy in information theory.

In the early 1960s Gregory Chaitin, Andrey Kolmogorov and Ray Solomonoff introduced the notion of algorithmic randomness, in which the randomness of a sequence depends on whether it is possible to compress it.

]]>
►Shizuko-Sophie◄ Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:25:32 +0100
Reply from ►Shizuko-Sophie◄ /post/226917-for-the-love-of-god-people-no-more#reply-4594686 Randomness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Semi-protected
“Random” redirects here. For other uses, see Random (disambiguation).

Randomness is a lack of order, purpose, cause, or predictability. A random process is a repeating process whose outcomes follow no describable deterministic pattern, but follow a probability distribution.

The term is often used in statistics to signify well-defined statistical properties, such as a lack of bias or correlation. Monte Carlo Methods, which rely on random input, are important techniques of computational science.[1] Random selection is an official method to resolve tied elections in some jurisdictions[2], and is even an ancient method of divination, as in tarot, the I Ching, and bibliomancy.

]]>
►Shizuko-Sophie◄ Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:25:16 +0100