Nothere12's shoutbox - Help.com

Hi :)
How are you?

I am sending my Christmas greetings already, just incase I don’t see you here before the big day, I am sure I will but I would rather be safe than sorry!
So….

Hope you have a Fabtastic Christmas and new year!!!

Emily
})i({

http://www.go-kat-go.com/deadduck.html
http://gargoylestore.com/cat8.html
http://www.captainquack.com/catalog/4…
http://www.amazon.com/Dead-Duck-Rubbe…
Amazon is probably best

There are many sites where you can find the dead duck…it’s about $3-4 depending where you go.

Please do not edit other people’s post.

you have GOT to buy a larger size of underwear!!!

it’s great to learn, just remember it is a process..and sometimes part of it is to learn an entire way of thinking just to be able to discard it for the next.

actually, that IS the key to learning, because you can never explain something, even to yourself, till you understand all the false arguments against it.

Put that in a report for extra credit…and remember it is a process..you WILL learn something later that totally and logically contridicts what you learned today.

THIS WAS MY ANSWER TO ANOTHER POST, BUT IT IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO PUT INTO WORDS

used book store is about 15 miles from ym house. I get about 20 miles to the gallon city. I use mid grade, which is $3.30 or so a gallon here.

I drive a 6 cylinder Jeep..a 96, but better on gas than most of my friends new cars..

$3.50 local used book store..but $3 worth of gas to get there, ha ha

my comp screwed up..I just found the problem.

then you will Love the book I recommended, ha ha..his Fiction is great, his technical prose(?) is very dry..or very outlandish, depending on the subject..if you read the whole book, you can see that this persons views on, say, Atomic power changed DRASTICALLY from 1950 to 1970..but yet, he was able to make convinving arguments from

then you will Love the book I recommended, ha ha..his Fiction is great, his technical prose(?) is very dry..or very outlandish, depending on the subject..if you read the whole book, you can see that this persons views on, say, Atomic power changed DRASTICALLY from 1950 to 1970..but yet, he was able to make convinving arguments from both points of view.

then you will Love the book I recommended, ha ha..his Fiction is great, his technical prose(?) is very dry..or very outlandish, depending on the subject..if you read the whole book, you can see that this persons views on, say, Atomic power changed DRASTICALLY from 1950 to 1970..but yet, he was able to make convinving arguments from both points of view.

if you have the patience, and the desire, find a way to copy this shouttrail…save it..look at it in even 5 years..that is the only thing I know to say.

the perspective will change, and you WILL, if you are as intellegent as you try to sound, see what I am talking about, but there is no way to see it now..

It is like asking a man from the 1200’s to describe the dark side of the moon.

there you go..because you have learned more (or more accuratly been exposed to more knowledge) in the last three years than you have in the previous 16 or so, you seem to belive that A. there is not much you either do not know or cannot figure out yourself and B. That the knowledge you have gained is somehow less curruptible than the knowledge others have gained..somehow more correct.

now this is pretty clear, as was my last statement, but since, for you, a core issue is your belief in your own intellectual superiority (not an insult, this is a natural stage), you cannot see it.

no way to explain the third year thing..no matter how I try to explain, it will sound, to you, as the subject, insulting..suffice to say, in 10 years or so, you will know EXACTLY what i mean, and will chuckle about it.

as for left to learn, by the age of 60, most humans have just learned HOW to learn..before that we just learn how to mimic.

but you see, I have been meditating since i was taught by a Taoist named Doug when I was 13..I am 35 now, and so forth and so on, yada yada..I have so much more to learn.

I just checked out who you are (past member) AH HA..well, at least I got third year right..should have left it at “third year college, right?” then i could feel all justified.

no offense but I gotta ask..3rd year college student, Majoring in Psychology ?

am I even close…be honest.

please do not be offended, as this is in no way an insult.

but you can always tell the book learning from the real life learning..we tend to stop using the fancy words after a few years of making the people receiving therapy feel inadequate.

hahahahaha…. sad but true… lmfao… seeing that i cant work due to a tumor on my spine caused by my exhusband.. i get the house chores done and find myself sitting here for a good part of the day… lol… sad.. but true… hehehehehehehe

TOS violation and yes, it was all of the replies you made regarding 2 girls and saying you were going to post the video that did it.

You’re welcome :)

Ok: I still don’t really understand this question. No one of these cards is able to validate this question, in my opinion. You could arrange them thus:

1. Nerd ::4. Poor communicator.
2. Jock ::3. Good communicator

However I would see this as invalid. On the other hand,

1. Nerd ::3. Good communicator
2. Jock ::4. Poor communicator.
does not validate the statement that you give.

Also, the statement says geek, the cards say nerd.. unless you assume the same definition, you really can’t use any of the cards here, because frankly, none of the cards have any direct relation to the statement. What’s more, if the cards were double sided with either 1::3 and 2::4 or 1::4 or 2::3, then it would be a similar problem to the first one… here, on the other hand, it’s different. Also… you say the answer is on the back: none of the statements on the cards will, by themselves, validate this statement… or for that matter, really, in conjunction with others as unless you give definitions, or decide on your terms, the cards have no real relation to the statement.

I answered the second question, I think….

I just did :)